A cortical code emerges in Layer5a of S1 through temporal integration of thalamic inputs
Quetu, T.; Shulz, D. E.; Goldin, M. A.
Show abstract
Tactile representations in the barrel field of the primary somatosensory cortex of rodents (wS1) receive inputs from two distinct thalamic nuclei, the ventro-posterior-medial nucleus (VPM) and the posterior medial complex (POm). Previous work has revealed a sweep-stick code in rat wS1 by using a novel whisker velocity-white noise stimulus. Sticks refer to high velocity single whisker bumps, while sweeps correspond to large multiwhisker displacements with extended temporal profiles. We hypothesized that barrel cortex neurons inherit stick responses from the VPM and sweep responses from the POm. Here we test this hypothesis by studying the coding strategy of both thalamic nuclei and wS1 in mice. We found a stratified wS1 representation of both sweep and stick functional classes, whereas VPM and POm contained mainly stick encoding neurons. Cortical layer 4 stick responses are a delayed version from VPM, while layer 5b sweep responses come from POm. Notably, layer 5a sweep responses result from a temporal integration of stick information from VPM and POm. Our results put forward a circuit scheme in which fast encoding stick events from VPM allow a fine-tuned texture processing in the cortex, modulated by sweep-responding cells that integrate multi-whisker information.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deciphering neuronal variability across states reveals dynamic sensory encoding 97%
- Continuous multiplexed population representations of task context in the mouse primary visual cortex 97%
- Feedforward and feedback interactions between visual cortical areas use different population activity patterns 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.