Back

Intratumoral heterogeneity in microsatellite instability at single cell resolution

Anthony, H.; Seoighe, C.

2025-07-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.11.658021 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Subclonal diversity within a tumor is highly relevant for tumor evolution and treatment. This diversity is often referred to as intratumoral heterogeneity and is known to complicate the interpretation of single-test biomarkers. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is one such biomarker, which is used to guide immune check-point inhibitor treatment through the classification of samples as either having high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or as being microsatellite stable (MSS). Although established as a therapeutic biomarker, it remains unclear whether MSI itself is a heterogeneous phenomenon. To investigate heterogeneity in MSI status, we integrated single-cell sequencing data from 134 samples across 49 individuals and developed a computational pipeline to infer MSI-H cells and quantify heterogeneity in MSI status. We found evidence of intratumoral heterogeneity in MSI both in individuals originally classified as MSI-H and MSS. Approximately a third of individuals showed evidence of divergence in MSI status between distinct clusters of cancer cells and most individuals had distinct MSI-H and MSS subclones. These results challenge the assumption that MSI should be treated as a binary biomarker and suggest the single-biopsy tests in current use could overlook a salient feature of this important molecular phenotype. Accounting for heterogeneity may lead to improved biomarker performance and, potentially, help explain reports of intrinsic treatment resistance and low overall response rate in MSI-H cancers. Further studies are warranted to determine the frequency of heterogeneity in MSI at the population level, and whether the presence of both MSI-H and MSS subclones can have clinical implications.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
3
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
12
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
18
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
NAR Cancer
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%