Exploring technology access, knowledge, and preferences for detection, monitoring, and support of cognitive health in rural communities
McCarthy, M.; McCoy, M. C.; Anderson, T.; Dopson, R.; Martinez, M.; Seaton, T.; Duong, D. A.; Cerino, E. S.
Show abstract
Approximately 25% of adults in the United States aged 60 years and older experience Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) which may be precursors to Alzheimers Disease. Families living in rural areas and contending with MCI/SCD face unique challenges due to geographic isolation, lack of specialty healthcare providers, and limited access to information and resources that support brain health. Thus, digital health technologies hold promise for improving cognitive health in rural communities. This study explored the access, knowledge, and preferences of rural individuals with MCI/SCD and their family members for detection, monitoring, and support of cognitive health. A convergent mixed methods design was used with semi-structured interviews informed by the Senior Technology Acceptance Model, paired with descriptive survey data from N=20 individuals with MCI/SCD and their family members. The majority of participants had access to and knowledge of technologies to support cognitive health, although preferences for detection, monitoring, and support differed between individuals with MCI/SCD and family members. Participants described aspects of technology that they valued (e.g., to organize and track tasks, to "exercise" ones brain, to communicate with healthcare providers, to promote safety of the person with MCI/SCD), as well as concerns that they had (e.g., "generational" barriers to adoption and use, financial cost, privacy and security, lack of human interaction). Findings from this study will directly inform the development of supportive technologies for meeting the needs of rural families experiencing MCI/SCD. Author SummaryRural "memory care deserts" are characterized by lack of specialty healthcare providers and lack of basic information and resources to support brain health. Although telehealth may be an option in such places, there are a variety of barriers that impede widespread implementation including lack of infrastructure and financial resources, limited high-speed internet, interstate provider and billing issues, and general mistrust among users of technology, as well as non-rural healthcare providers. Thus, digital health technologies that are inexpensive, user-friendly, sustainable, and delivered within community settings such as senior centers may hold promise for supporting brain health in rural communities. To successfully develop these technologies, however, we must have a deep understanding of the perspectives of potential users so that we may leverage what they value in technology (e.g., ability to organize and track tasks, to "exercise" the brain, to communicate with providers), as well as address the concerns that they have (e.g., cost, privacy and security, lack of human interaction). This mixed-methods study (qualitative interviews, survey data) explores these issues and provides information to directly inform development of brain health resources for rural memory care deserts.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Delivery of Age-friendly Health Services in Primary Health Care Centres in Southwest, Nigeria: A Qualitative Study 94%
- Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis 94%
- By the numbers and in their own words: A mixed methods study of unmet needs and humanitarian inclusion of older Syrian refugees in Lebanon 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Carers using assistive technology in dementia care: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study 96%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 96%
- “It makes you realise your own mortality.” A qualitative study on mental health of older adults in the UK during COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 93%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 92%
- Variation in real world dementia risk profiles in 6171 adults drawn from the Australian CogDrisk website according to demographic characteristics 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the GRACE voice assistant for dementia care among caregivers and healthcare professionals: An interview study. 94%
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- User Experience Evaluation of Cogscreen for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment: Formative and Summative Evaluation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- Protocol for a scoping review of the impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia 94%
- Validation of the German version of the Life-Space Assessment LSA-D 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.