Antimycotic Susceptibility of Environmental Airborne Yeasts: Evidence from Diverse Work Environments

BackgroundThis study compared the susceptibility of environmental yeast isolates from indoor and outdoor air collected at an electronics factory, an office, and a winery in Malaysia to various antifungal agents MethodsSabourauds Dextrose Agar (SDA) (supplemented with 0.05g/L Chloramphenicol to inhibit bacterial growth) and Dichloran Glycerol Agar (DG-18) (for xerophilic yeasts) were used for the isolation of yeasts. Air sample volumes ranging from 10 to 250 litres were drawn using the Ideal Air Sampler (Biomerieux BBL) and impacted onto DG-18 and SDA plates. SDA plates and DG-18 plates were subsequently incubated at 25{degrees}C and 21{degrees}C respectively for four days after sampling. Fourteen isolates were randomly selected from each sampling point at each sampling event. Yeast colonies were identified using the commercial biochemical panel Integral Systems Yeast Plus (Liofilchem) after the second subculture from the primary isolation plate. The system also characterises susceptibility to the following antimycotic agents: nystatin, amphotericin, flucytosine, econazole, ketoconazole, clotrimoxazole, miconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole and fluconazole. ResultsA total of 196 yeast isolates from ten species were tested. Cryptococcus laurentii was the predominant species across all sites. Most isolates were susceptible to ketoconazole, fluconazole, flucytosine, itraconazole, and nystatin. Lower susceptibility was observed for amphotericin and econazole. Overall, 61.7% of isolates were fully susceptible to all tested agents. ConclusionsThe majority of environmental airborne yeasts demonstrated susceptibility to common antimycotics. The dominance of Cryptococcus laurentii and the variable susceptibility patterns underscore the need for continued environmental surveillance