Safety of MVA-BN in Healthcare Personnel, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Minhaj, F. S.; Mandra, A.; Nguete, B. U.; Tran, S.; Kennedy, J.; Monroe, B.; Hughes, C.; Joseph, T.; Person, M. K.; Townsend, M. B.; Satheshkumar, P. S.; Likafi, T.; Kokola, G.; Kabamba, J.; Reynolds, M. G.; Rao, A. K.; Kasongo, D.; Yu, P. A.; Yu, Y.; Shongo, R.; Kaba, D.; Petersen, B.; McCollum, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundModified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) is a third generation, replication- deficient, smallpox and mpox vaccine prepared in liquid and lyophilized formulations. The Democratic Republic of the Congo reports the highest number of cases of clade I mpox annually. MethodsDuring the summer of 2017 and 2019, 1,600 healthcare personnel were enrolled in an investigational prospective cohort study to evaluate safety of the 2-dose MVA-BN vaccine series; 1000 were administered liquid and 600 were administered reconstituted lyophilized MVA-BN. Vaccine doses were given on study days 0 and 28 and presence or absence of adverse events were evaluated at routine follow-up appointments for up to two years. ResultsThere were 49% of liquid and 54% of lyophilized formulation participants who experienced at least one adverse event within 7 days. Eighteen serious adverse events, including seventeen deaths and one stillbirth, occurred within the 2-year study period; safety monitors deemed none were causally associated with vaccine administration. Fourteen pregnancies occurred within one month of vaccination, 13 gave birth to healthy infants. ConclusionsThis study adds to the growing body of literature on the safety of MVA-BN in different populations. The data from this Congolese cohort demonstrate good safety outcomes for up to two years with both liquid and lyophilized vaccine formulations. As MVA-BN vaccination campaigns are launched in endemic and surrounding countries in late 2024 as part of clade I mpox outbreak response efforts, the data from this study supporting safety of MVA-BN in an African population are crucial to build vaccine confidence. Trial registry number: NCT02977715
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and Safety Following a Homologous Booster Dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 97%
- Safety Monitoring of mRNA Vaccines Administered During the Initial 6 Months of the U.S. COVID-19 Vaccination Program: Reports to Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and v-safe 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of An Egg-Based Inactivated Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Interim Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Trial in Vietnam 97%
- A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity 96%
- Safety of the NVX-CoV2373 COVID-19 Vaccine in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Homologous and heterologous boosting of the ChAdOx1-S1-S COVID-19 vaccine with the SCB-2019 vaccine candidate: a randomized, observer-blinded, controlled, phase 2 study 97%
- Global Safety Assessment of Adverse Events of Special Interest Following 2 Years of Use and 772 Million Administered Doses of mRNA-1273 96%
- Correlation of post-vaccination fever with specific antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 booster and no significant influence of antipyretic medication 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 97%
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 97%
- Analysis of immunization, adverse events, and efficacy of a fourth dose of BNT162b2 vaccine 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.