Back

Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation

DUMAS, P.

2025-06-15 biophysics
10.1101/2025.06.10.658876 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation (EEC) is observed in many unrelated domains. It appears as a strong correlation of the variations {Delta}{Delta}H and {Delta}{Delta}S of enthalpy and entropy resulting from experiments performed either at different temperatures on a given system (e.g. the binding of a ligand on a macromolecule), or at the same temperature T on related systems (e.g. the binding of related ligands on a macromolecule). In both cases, EEC is characterized by the compensation temperatures ({Delta}{Delta}H/{Delta}{Delta}S). When a continuous variable X (e.g. X = pH) characterizes the related systems at constant temperature, {Theta}T = ({partial}{Delta}H/{partial}{Delta}S)T may be used in lieu of the ratio of finite variations and when T is variable and X constant, one may always consider {Theta}X = ({partial}{Delta}H/{partial}{Delta}S)X. Thermodynamics trivially imposes {Theta}X {equiv} T, but also {Theta}T = T +{delta} T (X, T), where the corrective term{delta} T (X, T) only depends on {Delta}G(X, T). The quest for molecular explanations of EEC is thus vain: only the value of {Theta}T deserves such explanations. This is illustrated with the denaturation of globular proteins and with the dissociation of hydrophobic peptides from a specific protein. The theoretical estimate {Theta}T = (T - T*)/Ln(T /T*) with T*[~=] 383 K being imposed by experiments, fits well experimental results. Considerations of molecular dynamics (MD) methods led to a theoretical estimate for {Theta}T when no continuous variable X exists. One might obtain better MD estimates of {Delta}H and {Delta}S of binding by imposing the correct value of {Theta}T.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.