Back

fMRI-Based CSF Flow Quantification Identifies Cardiac Pulsatility as the Dominant Driver Over Respiratory and Slow Vasomotion Cycles

Soderstrom, P.; Bjornfot, C.; Andersson, B. M.; Malm, J.; Eklund, A.; Wahlin, A.

2025-06-14 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.10.658005 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow oscillations have emerged as a potentially important marker related to brain clearance, but their acquisition often relies on specialized imaging MRI sequences. The purpose of this work was to enable quantitative assessment of CSF flow associated with cardiac, respiratory, and slow-vasomotion cycles using widely available functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquisitions. MethodsA method was developed to translate fMRI-derived CSF inflow signals into quantitative flow rates. This approach modelled the spin-history of an oscillating ensemble of molecules. Validation was performed using phantom experiments with oscillatory flow at cardiac-, respiratory-, and slow-vasomotion-like frequencies. The method was further applied to resting-state data from 48 older adults (68-82 years; 19 women) to characterize CSF flow at the foramen magnum. ResultsPhantom experiments demonstrated excellent correlations between estimated and true velocities for cardiac- and respiratory-like frequencies (r = 0.94 and 0.97, respectively) and moderate correlation for a slow-vasomotion-like frequency (r = 0.58). In the population cohort, median CSF stroke volumes were 0.86 [0.61, 1.17] mL for the cardiac cycle, 0.44 [0.25, 0.94] mL for the respiratory cycle, and 0.28 [0.14, 0.45] mL for the slow-vasomotion cycle. ConclusionThe proposed spin-history modeling method enabled quantitative estimation of CSF flow components using a conventional fMRI dataset and showed that the cardiac cycle dominates CSF motion at the foramen magnum.

Published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.