Can neuromuscular electrostimulation fulfil an unmet need for mechanical thromboprophylaxis in acute stroke patients? A real-world retrospective analysis.
Natarajan, I.; Griffin, A.; Sekaran, L. S.; Sethuraman, S.; Sword, J.; Targett, M.-T.
Show abstract
Aims and MethodThis retrospective analysis examines real-world registry data to assess the incidence of symptomatic VTE in a non-randomised cohort where IPC was either contraindicated or not tolerated, leading to the use of Neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) to meet prophylactic needs. We consider the alternative VTE risk of no prophylactic intervention other than standard measures and utilise the data from the CLOTS 3 trial to evaluate the incidence of symptomatic VTE in a cohort that was randomly assigned to receive no IPC intervention, The outcomes from both cohorts are then compared to determine which group exhibits better clinical results. ResultsA comparison of symptomatic VTE incidence revealed a significantly lower rate in patients prescribed NMES as their first-line intervention of 1.5% compared to no IPC reported in CLOTS 3 (8.7%). The reduction in VTE risk between no IPC treatment and NMES as prescribed as a front-line sole intervention in the unmet need is statistically significant. (p<0.00001, Fishers exact test). Health EconomicsIn terms of an economic analysis the average treatment with the NMES device in this pathway is 9 days and the cost of NMES is {pound}243. In the unmet need scenario described above this results in an approximate 5% reduction in symptomatic VTE risk compared to no IPC intervention. The economic saving of this reduction in VTE risk compared to no IPC is modelled to be {pound}303 per patient. ConclusionThis retrospective analysis indicates that NMES offers an effective alternative for VTE mechanical prophylaxis in immobile acute stroke patients, a high-risk cohort, delivering significantly improved VTE outcomes compared to no IPC treatment. Further clinical insight from this registry suggests that the VTE outcomes achieved with the NMES device are comparable to those reported for IPC, further supporting its inclusion in the VTE prevention pathway.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidence Of Venous Thrombotic Events And Events Of Special Interest In A Retrospective Cohort Of Commercially-Insured US Patients 94%
- Does the elevated (thrombosis risk of males relative to females help account for the excess male mortality observed in Covid-19? An observational study 93%
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 91%
- Is higher-level trauma center care associated with better outcomes in patients injured by low-energy trauma? 90%
- Blood parameters measured on admission as predictors of outcome for COVID-19; a prospective UK cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A claims-based score for the prediction of bleeding in a contemporary cohort of patients receiving oral anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism 94%
- Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg in moderate and severe acute ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of NOR-TEST & NOR-TEST 2A 92%
- Intravenous Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy Improves Functional Outcome after Stroke Independent of Reperfusion Grade 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 94%
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 93%
- Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis from the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Risk Assessment Model Predicts Major Bleeding Risk at Admission in Medical Inpatients 93%
- Genetic risk and incident venous thromboembolism in middle-aged and older adults following Covid-19 vaccination 91%
- Optimal adherence thresholds for oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation using machine learning and population administrative data 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.