Personalized whole-brain Ising models with heterogeneous nodes capture differences among brain regions
Craig, A. G.; Chen, S.; Tang, Q.-Y.; Zhou, C.
Show abstract
Multiple lines of research have studied how complex brain dynamics emerge from underlying connectivity by using Ising models as simplified neural mass models. However, limitations on parameter estimation have prevented their use with individual, high-resolution human neuroimaging data. Furthermore, most studies focus only on connectivity, ignoring node heterogeneity, even though real brain regions have different structural and dynamical properties. Here we present an improved approach to fitting Ising models to 360-region functional MRI data: derivation of an initial guess model from group data, optimization of simulation temperature, and two stages of Boltzmann learning, first with group data, then with individual data. Our implementation uses GPU acceleration to mitigate the high computational cost of this approach. We then analyze how data binarization threshold affects goodness-of-fit, the role of the external field in model behavior, consistency among models fitted to different scans of the same individual, and correlations between model parameters and features from structural MRI, including measures of myelination and cortical folding. We find that binarizing fMRI data at higher thresholds decreases correlation between model and data functional connectivity but increases the heterogeneity of node external fields and their correlations with structural features. A choice of threshold that achieves both goodness-of-fit and intrinsic heterogeneity of regions results in a model that better reflects the reality of the brain as a network of intrinsically heterogeneous nodes. By enabling personalized, biophysically interpretable modeling of structure-function mapping across the whole brain, this approach can aid understanding of individual differences in brain network organization and bridge the gap between the network-focused methodology of connectomics and the region-focused paradigm typical of translational research.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamical models reveal anatomically reliable attractor landscapes embedded in resting state brain networks 98%
- Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap 97%
- A hierarchical Bayesian brain parcellation framework for fusion of functional imaging datasets 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of individual melodic contour processing in sensory association cortices from resting state functional connectivity 96%
- FEMA: Fast and efficient mixed-effects algorithm for large sample whole-brain imaging data 95%
- Non-linear manifold learning in fMRI uncovers a low-dimensional space of brain dynamics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.