Back

PARP1 and PARP2 are dispensable for DNA repair by microhomology-mediated end-joining during mitosis.

Ortega, R.; Taylor, E.; Whitehead, S. M.; Danhorn, T.; Bitler, B. G.; Arnoult, N. G.

2025-06-09 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.06.09.658719 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are standard of care treatment for cancers with homologous-recombination deficiencies. Yet, as tumors develop resistance, complementary strategies are emerging, including targeting microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). Given that PARP1 is widely described as a key promoter of MMEJ, one would expect PARP inhibition to suppress MMEJ--potentially making MMEJ inhibition redundant. MMEJ was originally described as a backup pathway, with seminal work linking PARP1 to MMEJ conducted in NHEJ-deficient cells, where MMEJ can be reactivated in G1. However, we now appreciate that MMEJ is a mitotic repair mechanism, but the function of PARP1 in this context remains unclear. Here, we systematically explore the effect that PARP/PARPi have on MMEJ activity in cells with intact NHEJ. Surprisingly, PARP inhibition leads to elevated Pol{theta}-dependent MMEJ levels at ISceI-mediated DSBs, which we find is due to PARP1s regulation of competing pathways at these breaks. Importantly, we show that PARP is dispensable for MMEJ at double-ended DSBs and is expendable for repair of DSBs during mitosis. Altogether, this data shifts the understanding of PARPs role in MMEJ and DNA repair pathway choice. Moreover, we believe this data further strengthens a rationale for PARPi/MMEJi combinatorial drug treatment in HR-deficient cancers.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.