Back

Bacterial extracellular vesicles as a tunable platform for vaginal drug delivery

Steinman, D.; Hemanth, V.; McIlvaine, R.; Tyagi, P.; Kang, H.; Alam, R.; Liu, A.; Jewell, C.; Burd, I.; Molinari, S.; Zierden, H.

2025-06-09 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.06.09.658669 bioRxiv
Show abstract

There is a critical gap in the development of new therapeutic platforms designed to treat gynecologic and obstetric diseases. Compared to systemic drug delivery, vaginal drug administration of nanoparticle formulations limits off-target side effects while increasing therapeutic concentration in target tissues, showing promise for clinical translation. However, these formulations suffer from limited scalability, high-cost reagents, and long optimization timelines. Recent work highlights the potential of bacterial extracellular vesicles (bEVs) as a low-cost, tunable platform for therapeutic applications. Here, we evaluate bEVs as a therapeutic carrier for vaginal drug delivery. We demonstrate the loading of the model protein moxNeonGreen into Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 bEVs. By optimizing growth parameters, we increase protein loading into bEVs. We evaluate the effect of bEVs on the vaginal microenvironment, and observe no negative impact on vaginal epithelial cells, endocervical cells, or vaginal bacteria in vitro. Additionally, we observe the retention of bEVs in the murine female reproductive tract for more than six hours. This study provides a framework for using genetically engineered bEVs to rapidly generate customizable therapies for a range of gynecologic and obstetric conditions, addressing longstanding challenges in womens health therapeutics. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=50 SRC="FIGDIR/small/658669v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (19K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e483d2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8a6d2corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5756borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5fdb67_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.