Back

DR5 CAR-T cells target solid tumors and suppress MDSCs with minimal toxicity

Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Sinha, P.; Liu, F.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Y.; Goncalves, B.; Zheng, Q.; Mou, H.; Yang, J.; Huang, L.; Scholler, J.; Miao, F.; Zeng, T.; Karakousis, G.; Huang, A. C.; Mitchell, T.; Amaravadi, R.; Schuchter, L.; Milone, M.; Guo, W.; June, C. H.; Herlyn, M.; Fan, Y.; Xu, X.

2025-06-12 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.06.09.658618 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have poor efficacy in solid tumors due to limited target specificity and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. We investigated death receptor 5 (DR5) as a CAR target based on its high expression in both solid tumors and myeloid- derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). We engineered agonistic DR5-specific CAR constructs and evaluated their activity in multiple models, demonstrating DR5-expression-dependent tumor killing, confirmed by knockout and overexpression experiments. DR5-targeting single-chain variable fragments retained their pro-apoptotic activity when expressed on non-effector cells or extracellular vesicles. Among multiple CAR designs, we identified a construct with optimized binding affinity that maintained T cell viability while preserving strong tumor and MDSC-killing potency. To assess safety and efficacy in an immunocompetent setting, we also developed a murine DR5-targeted CAR. In multiple xenograft and syngeneic mouse models, DR5 CAR-T cells reduced tumor growth, prolonged survival, and did not cause detectable toxicity. In patient- derived organoids and tissue slices, DR5 CAR-T cells infiltrated tumor tissues, reduced MDSCs, boosted CD8+ T cell activity, and inhibited tumor growth. These findings support DR5-targeted CAR-T therapy as a promising strategy for treating solid tumors, which combines direct tumor cytotoxicity with immune activation and minimizes off-target effects. TeaserDR5 CAR-T cells eliminate tumor cells and MDSCs and activate tumor-resident CD8+ T cells within the TME.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.