Back

Quantitative trait loci mapping of gene expression and chromatin accessibility in primary fibroblast reveals shared allelic effects between Latin American and European ancestries

Boltz, T.; Bot, M.; Lapinska, S.; Schwarz, T.; Hou, K.; Garske, K. M.; Freund, M. K.; Bearden, C. E.; Macaya, G.; Lopez-Jaramillo, C.; Freimer, N. B.; Boks, M. P.; Kahn, R. S.; Pasaniuc, B.; Ophoff, R. A.

2025-06-10 genomics
10.1101/2025.06.09.658613 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) analysis of molecular data has identified genetic variants associated with traits such as gene expression, and colocalization of these functional QTL with GWAS risk loci has offered insights into the genetic basis of human disease. We employed gene expression (RNA-seq) and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq) obtained from human primary fibroblasts to investigate quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in cohorts ascertained for bipolar disorder of European (n=150) and Latin American (n=96) ancestries. Leveraging data from three countries of origin (The Netherlands, Colombia, Costa Rica) within our cohort, we characterized differences among individuals at the SNP, gene, and accessible-chromatin levels to compute ancestry-specific expression (e)QTLs and chromatin-accessibility (ca)QTLs. Across ancestries, we observed R{superscript 2} [≥] 0.93 for eQTL effect sizes and R{superscript 2} [≥] 0.95 for caQTLs, indicating a high degree of concordance. Integrating chromatin data with expression and genotype information enabled precise fine-mapping of eQTLs, yielding 203 high-confidence (posterior probability > 90 %) regulatory pathways. In downstream analyses, transcriptome-wide (TWAS) and chromatin-wide (CWAS) association studies with brain- and skin-related GWAS identified 36 TWAS-significant genes and 77 CWAS-significant open chromatin regions. These findings underscore the shared genetic regulatory mechanisms across European and Latin American ancestries, while demonstrating that ancestry-specific reference panels enhance the accuracy of TWAS and CWAS in diverse populations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.7%
2
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.2%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
5
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
6
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
7
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
9
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
11
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
16
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
19
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
24
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%