Linking Trials to Publications: Enhancing Recall by Identifying Trial Registry Mentions in Full-Text
Holt, A. W.; Smalheiser, N. R.
Show abstract
We have developed a free, public web-based tool, Trials to Publications, https://arrowsmith.psych.uic.edu/cgi-bin/arrowsmith_uic/TrialPubLinking/trial_pub_link_start.cgi, which employs a machine learning model to predict which publications are likely to present clinical outcome results from a given registered trial in ClinicalTrials.gov. The tool has reasonably high precision, yet in a recent study we found that when registry mentions are not explicitly listed in metadata, textual clues (in title, abstract or other metadata) could identify only roughly 1/3-1/2 of the publications with high confidence. This finding has led us to expand the scope of the tool, to search for explicit mentions of registry numbers that are located within the full-text of publications. We have now retrieved ClinicalTrials.gov registry number mentions (NCT numbers) from the full-text of 3 online biomedical article collections (open access PubMed Central, EuroPMC, and OpenAlex), as well as retrieving biomedical citations that are mentioned within the ClinicalTrials.gov registry itself. These methods greatly increase the recall of identifying linked publications, and should assist those carrying out evidence syntheses as well as those studying the meta-science of clinical trials. HighlightsO_LIThose conducting systematic reviews, other evidence syntheses, and meta-science analyses often need to examine published evidence arising from clinical trials. Finding publications linked to a given trial is a difficult manual process, but several automated tools have been developed. The Trials to Publications tool is the only free, public, currently maintained web-based tool that predicts publications linked to a given trial in ClinicalTrials.gov. C_LIO_LIA recent analysis indicated that the Trials to Publications tool has good precision but limited recall. In the present paper, we greatly enhanced the recall by identifying registry mentions in full-text of articles indexed in open access PubMed Central, EuroPMC and OpenAlex. C_LIO_LIThe tool now has reasonably comprehensive coverage of registry mentions, both for identifying articles that present trial outcome results and for other types of articles that are linked to, or that discuss, the trials. This should greatly save effort during web searches of the literature. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigator-initiated versus industry-sponsored trials – Visibility and relevance of randomized controlled trials in clinical practice guidelines (IMPACT) 96%
- Improving research transparency with individualized report cards: A feasibility study in clinical trials at a large university medical center 94%
- Approaches in Analyzing Predictors of Trial Failure: A Scoping Review and Meta-epidemiological study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 96%
- Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries was often missing or delayed 96%
- Results dissemination from clinical trials conducted at German university medical centres was delayed and incomplete 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 96%
- Exploring scalable assessment methods for terminated trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cohort analysis of German and Californian trials 96%
- An interactive retrieval system for clinical trial studies with context-dependent protocol elements 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.