Back

Cell type proportions rather than DNA methylation in the cord blood show significant associations with severe preeclampsia

Yang, X.; Liu, W.; Mao, Z.; Du, Y.; Lassiter, C.; AlAkwaa, F. M.; Benny, P. A.; Garmire, L.

2025-06-10 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.06.09.25329270 medRxiv
Show abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is a severe pregnancy complication that threatens maternal and neonatal health. Previous epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) on PE have produced inconsistent results, possibly due to inadequate adjustment for confounders. Here, we analyzed DNA methylation changes in cord blood from newborns affected by PE, using a multi-ethnic cohort from Hawaii. We comprehensively adjusted for clinical variables (maternal age, BMI, parity) and estimated cell proportions. Additionally, we re-analyzed two public datasets with similar adjustments and conducted a meta-analysis combining all three datasets to increase statistical power. To further address confounding by gestational age, we also included idiopathic preterm samples as controls. After adjusting for cell type proportions and clinical characteristics, all previously reported significant CpG methylation changes associated with severe PE disappeared across our data, the two public datasets, and the meta-analysis. This result remained even after including idiopathic preterm samples. Instead, severe PE was associated with shifts in CD8T and natural killer (NK) cell proportions. We validated this lack of CpG changes using multiple published cord blood methylation datasets. Moreover, we observed that gestational progression itself is accompanied by significant changes in granulocyte, nRBC, CD8T, and B cell proportions. In summary, our study demonstrates that many previously reported DNA methylation changes in severe PE are artifacts caused by confounding factors such as cell type heterogeneity and gestational age. Severe PE is associated with changes in cell proportions rather than direct methylation alterations. These findings emphasize the importance of rigorous confounder adjustment in EWAS.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epigenetics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.1%
3
Epigenomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
6
Placenta
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
8
Clinical Epigenetics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
11
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
19
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%