Back

Cell type proportions rather than DNA methylation in the cord blood show significant associations with severe preeclampsia

Yang, X.; Liu, W.; Mao, Z.; Du, Y.; Lassiter, C.; AlAkwaa, F. M.; Benny, P. A.; Garmire, L.

2025-06-10 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.06.09.25329270 medRxiv
Show abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is a severe pregnancy complication that threatens maternal and neonatal health. Previous epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) on PE have produced inconsistent results, possibly due to inadequate adjustment for confounders. Here, we analyzed DNA methylation changes in cord blood from newborns affected by PE, using a multi-ethnic cohort from Hawaii. We comprehensively adjusted for clinical variables (maternal age, BMI, parity) and estimated cell proportions. Additionally, we re-analyzed two public datasets with similar adjustments and conducted a meta-analysis combining all three datasets to increase statistical power. To further address confounding by gestational age, we also included idiopathic preterm samples as controls. After adjusting for cell type proportions and clinical characteristics, all previously reported significant CpG methylation changes associated with severe PE disappeared across our data, the two public datasets, and the meta-analysis. This result remained even after including idiopathic preterm samples. Instead, severe PE was associated with shifts in CD8T and natural killer (NK) cell proportions. We validated this lack of CpG changes using multiple published cord blood methylation datasets. Moreover, we observed that gestational progression itself is accompanied by significant changes in granulocyte, nRBC, CD8T, and B cell proportions. In summary, our study demonstrates that many previously reported DNA methylation changes in severe PE are artifacts caused by confounding factors such as cell type heterogeneity and gestational age. Severe PE is associated with changes in cell proportions rather than direct methylation alterations. These findings emphasize the importance of rigorous confounder adjustment in EWAS.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.4%
2
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
3
Epigenomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.0%
6
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
10
Placenta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
12
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Biology of Reproduction
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
17
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
20
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
24
Molecular Human Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
30
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%