Back

Part 1: Examining heterogeneity of treatment effects in transcranial direct current stimulation for knee osteoarthritis pain and symptoms

Lee, C.; Sun, X.; Park, J.; Chen, C. X.; Pellegrini, C.; Chen, N.-k.; Garcia, D. O.; Kim, H.; Kwoh, C. K.; Ahn, H.

2025-06-09 pain medicine
10.1101/2025.06.09.25329205 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlthough heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) is commonly observed in clinical trials, it has received little attention in studies on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). This study aimed to identify the presence of HTE in tDCS treatment among participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and to explore participant characteristics associated with this heterogeneity. MethodsThis exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 120 participants with symptomatic KOA who received 15 daily sessions of home-based 2-mA active or sham tDCS (20 minutes per session) over three weeks. First, we used a multi-trajectory latent class growth analysis to identify distinct subgroups based on the longitudinal trajectories of KOA pain and symptoms from baseline to three months postintervention, capturing differential responses to tDCS. We then performed bivariate analyses to examine associations between trajectory groups and baseline demographic, clinical, and quantitative sensory testing characteristics. ResultsIn the active tDCS group, two distinct trajectories emerged: "low initial symptoms with significant improvement" (high responders; n = 28) and "high initial symptoms with minimal improvement" (low responders; n = 32). Compared to high responders, low responders had a higher body mass index (p = .040), lower educational attainment (p = .013), and greater pain catastrophizing (p < .000). Low responders also exhibited lower pressure pain thresholds at both the medial knee (p = .009) and trapezius (p = .002), higher punctate mechanical pain at both the patella (p = .013) and hand (p = .016), lower conditioned pain modulation at 30 seconds (p = .008) and 60 seconds (p < .000), and higher cold pain intensity (p = .003) at baseline. No notable HTE was observed in the sham tDCS group. ConclusionParticipants exhibited varying responses to active tDCS. The characteristics associated with HTE may inform the development of personalized stimulation protocols. Further research is needed to investigate potential HTE in the sham tDCS group and refine strategies to address placebo-related effects.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.8%
5
The Journal of Pain
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Pain Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.3%
8
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
11
European Journal of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Brain Research Bulletin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Neurotherapeutics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
21
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%