Perceptions, Attitudes, and Lived Experiences of Therapists with Lower Limb Robotic Exoskeletons in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, often resulting in impaired walking ability. Lower limb robotic exoskeletons are an emerging technology in stroke rehabilitation that may enhance walking recovery. However, little is known about therapists perceptions, attitudes, and experiences with robotic exoskeletons. This protocol outlines a systematic review that aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the perceptions, attitudes, and lived experiences of physical therapists and occupational therapists who use lower limb robotic exoskeletons in stroke rehabilitation. The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. Eight electronic databases will be searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Qualitative studies published in peer-reviewed journals that report on the perceptions, attitudes, or experiences of physical therapists and/or occupational therapists who have used lower limb robotic exoskeletons for stroke rehabilitation will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data, and assess methodological quality using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Thematic synthesis will be used to analyze and interpret the data. Understanding therapists perceptions is crucial for the successful integration of robotic exoskeletons into clinical practice. Findings from this review will provide insights to guide implementation, training, and support for therapists using this technology. Results will inform an understanding of potential barriers and facilitators that can be used to optimize the use of robotic exoskeletons in stroke rehabilitation. This review will make a unique contribution by synthesizing qualitative evidence on an emerging topic with important implications for stroke rehabilitation practice.