Neurodevelopmental Impact of Bipolar Disorder Genetic Risk on Cortical Thickness and Network Topology in Adolescents
Liu, X.; Liu, L.; Yan, J.; He, J.; Wan, B.; Ge, R.; Xiao, J.; Yang, G.
Show abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a highly heritable psychiatric condition characterized by recurrent mood episodes that commonly manifest during adolescence. Although polygenic risk scores (PRS) effectively quantify genetic susceptibility to BD, the neurobiological correlates of this genetic risk during adolescent brain development remain unclear. Using normative modeling and longitudinal neuroimaging data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort (N = 4519), we examined cortical thickness (CT) deviations and structural covariance network (SCN) alterations in adolescents stratified into high and low BD genetic risk groups based on PRS. Adolescents with high PRS for bipolar disorder exhibited greater cortical thickening in the inferior frontal gyrus and primary visual cortex, whereas those with low PRS demonstrated greater thickening in the posterior cingulate cortex and middle precentral gyrus. These patterns suggest PRS-related variations in cortical maturation, potentially reflecting distinct neurodevelopmental trajectories associated with genetic susceptibility to bipolar disorder. Furthermore, high PRS individuals displayed altered SCN topology, characterized by decreased local clustering and enhanced global network efficiency. Longitudinal data show that these abnormal regions exhibit atypical developmental trajectories, accompanied by a global reorganization of network topology. Additionally, high genetic risk was associated with lifestyle factors, especially correlated with increased positive expectancies toward substance use. Eventually, we found three potential BD risk genes during adolescence, including PLEKHA2, ZSCAN31 and ANK3, encoding the function of the postsynaptic membrane and synaptic membrane. These findings elucidate early neurodevelopmental deviations linked to genetic risk for BD, highlighting potential biomarkers for early identification and targeted interventions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting depression risk in early adolescence via multimodal brain imaging 94%
- Brain Anatomical Covariation Patterns Linked to Binge Drinking and Age at First Full Drink Prior to 21 Years 94%
- Exploring the longitudinal associations of functional network connectivity and psychiatric symptom changes in youth 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology explain individuals' unique deviations from normative neurodevelopment in brain structure 95%
- Psychotic-like experiences, polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and structural properties of the salience, default mode and central-executive networks in healthy participants from UK Biobank 94%
- The Influence of Phenotyping Method on Structural Neuroimaging Associations with Depression in UK Biobank 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural Brain Imaging Studies Offer Clues about the Effects of the Shared Genetic Etiology among Neuropsychiatric Disorders 95%
- Connectome architecture shapes large-scale cortical alterations in schizophrenia: a worldwide ENIGMA study 94%
- Structural brain alterations associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people: results across 21 international studies from the ENIGMA Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours consortium 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations Between Polygenic Scores for Cognitive and Non-cognitive Factors of Educational Attainment and Measures of Behavior, Psychopathology, and Neuroimaging in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study 95%
- Effective connectivity during faces processing in major depression – distinguishing markers of pathology, risk, and resilience 94%
- Assessing regional intracortical myelination in schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar disorders using the optimized T1w/T2w-ratio 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.