Prenatal therapies to improve outcomes in gastroschisis: A systematic scoping review protocol
Varela, M. F.; Oria, M.; Reed, J.; Kosaka, S.; Lopriore, E.; Peiro, J. L.
Show abstract
IntroductionGastroschisis is a congenital birth defect with a rising incidence. The herniation of intestines into the amniotic cavity leads to prenatal bowel injury, which contributes to significant postnatal morbidity and mortality. Current management focuses on postnatal interventions, though bowel injury begins in utero. Emerging interest in prenatal therapies aims to mitigate this injury and improve outcomes. However, none of these interventions have been widely adopted in clinical practice, highlighting the need for further research and validation. ObjectivesOutline the procedures to conduct a systematic scoping review of prenatal interventions to improve outcomes for gastroschisis, identifying gaps in the literature to guide future research and inform clinical practice. Methods and analysisThis systematic scoping review will follow the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. We will include studies on prenatal interventions for gastroschisis in both human and animal models. Key databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and others will be searched. Gray literature and clinical trial registries will also be reviewed. Studies will be screened, selected, and data extracted in duplicate using predefined criteria. Descriptive analysis will summarize findings, grouped by intervention, with outcomes presented in a narrative synthesis. Ethics and DisseminationAs a scoping review, no ethical approval is required since no primary data collection or direct subject involvement is involved. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conferences, and relevant digital platforms. RegistrationThe review protocol has been registered within the Open Science Framework database (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/39DSQ) Key MessagesO_LIWhat is already known on this topic -While several reviews have explored prenatal interventions for gastroschisis, they are often limited in scope-- focusing on surgical approaches alone--and frequently lack systematic methodology, limiting the reliability and comprehensiveness of their findings. C_LIO_LIWhat this study hopes to add - This scoping review aims to systematically map and evaluate all published prenatal interventions for gastroschisis, including both surgical and non-surgical approaches. C_LIO_LIHow this study might affect research, practice or policy - By identifying existing evidence and gaps, this review may inform future research priorities, support clinical decision-making, and contribute to evaluating the potential role of fetal therapy in improving outcomes for gastroschisis. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 and pregnancy: An umbrella review of clinical presentation, vertical transmission, and maternal and perinatal outcomes 95%
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 94%
- Protocol for a sequential, prospective meta-analysis to describe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the pregnancy and postpartum periods 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neonatal outcomes and indirect consequences following maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: A systematic review 94%
- Out-of-hospital births and the experiences of emergency ambulance clinicians and birthing parents: A scoping review of the literature 94%
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postpartum hypogalactia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between endotypes of prematurity and pharmacological closure of patent ductus arteriosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Extremely preterm infant admissions within the SafeBoosC-III consortium during the COVID-19 lockdown 94%
- Psychosocial and psychological Interventions’ effectiveness among Nurses in Intensive Care Units caring for pediatric patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigation of factors associated with delayed initiation of breastfeeding in Papua New Guinea: a cross-sectional study 91%
- Systematic review of the evidence of cardiac dysfunction and intravenous fluid use among children with severe acute malnutrition and severe dehydration. 90%
- Early diagnosis of coeliac disease in the Preventive Youth Health Care Centres in the Netherlands: study protocol of a case-finding study (GLUTENSCREEN) 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.