Back

Monalisa: An Open Source, Documented, User-Friendly MATLAB Toolbox for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction

Leidi, M.; Jia, Y.; Helbing, D.; Barranco, J.; Acikgoz, B. C.; Peper, E.; Ledoux, J.-B.; Bastiaansen, J. A. M.; Franceschiello, B.; Milani, B.

2025-08-25 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.06.658299 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAn open-source, user-friendly MATLAB framework for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) reconstruction was developed to simplify the reconstruction process, with a specific focus on non-Cartesian imaging and dynamic applications in the presence of motion. MethodsMonalisa is decomposing the reconstruction pipeline into clear modular steps, including raw data reading with flexible file-type abstraction, trajectory computation, density compensation, advanced coil sensitivity mapping, and tailored binning strategies through its "mitosius" preprocessing stage. The framework supports a suite of reconstruction methods, including iterative-SENSE (also named CG-SENSE), GeneRalized Autocalibrating Partial Parallel Acquisition (GRAPPA) reconstructions, and regularized reconstructions supporting both spatial and temporal regularization using l1 (Compressed Sensing (CS)) and l2 techniques, accommodating both Cartesian and non-Cartesian acquisitions. We performed benchmark experiments comparing Monalisa with the Berkeley Advanced Reconstruction Toolbox (BART) toolbox on simulated 2D radial acquisitions. ResultsResults of the comparison demonstrate competitive performance, yielding higher Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and lower l2 error. Notably, Monalisa reconstructions exhibited fewer visible artifacts than BART. ConclusionBy providing comprehensive documentation, Monalisa serves not only as a powerful tool for research and clinical imaging but also as an educational platform to facilitate innovation in MRI reconstruction.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.