Investigating multiple types of resistance against a homing gene drive in European populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Faber, N. R.; Champer, J.; Pannebakker, B. A.; Zwaan, B. J.; van den Heuvel, J.
Show abstract
Gene drive technology may be a valuable tool for addressing several contemporary challenges, including combating disease vectors, conserving biodiversity, and controlling agricultural pests. Homing gene drives spread through a population by copying themselves onto the homologous chromosome in the germline of heterozygous individuals. However, it is possible that resistance will evolve against homing gene drives, especially if the goal is to suppress or eliminate a pest population so that resistance alleles have a large selective advantage over the gene drive. Resistance can result from a simple mutation at the drives target site, which is found in many studies but can potentially be avoided by improving drive design. However, a more complex polygenic type of resistance could also evolve through selection on standing genetic variation that affects the efficiency of the spread of the gene drive. In this study, we test an efficient homing gene drive in genetically diverse lines of Drosophila melanogaster, collected from across Europe by the DrosEU Consortium. We find that the gene drive shows considerable variability in homing efficiency, but that none of this variability can be ascribed to heritable genetic effects. Selection for complex resistance is thus unlikely and will be inefficient, probably still giving a gene drive enough time to fixate in the population. However, although our tested gene drive targets a highly conserved haploinsufficient gene with two gRNAs, we find simple resistance alleles in viable offspring. Half of these are the product of end-joining repair instead of homing and may still carry heavy fitness costs. However, the other half are the result of partial homing events. These alleles indicate that resistance could likely evolve against this gene drive in a simple, non-polygenic way. Therefore, more effective strategies may be required to address simple resistance mutations, whereas complex resistance may be unlikely to pose a substantial barrier to the employment of at least certain types of gene drive.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single cell RNA-sequencing reveals no evidence for meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in the threespine stickleback fish 95%
- Heterozygous Inversion Breakpoints Suppress Meiotic Crossovers by Altering Recombination Repair Outcomes 94%
- Double drives and private alleles for localised population genetic control 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene drive that results in addiction to a temperature sensitive version of an essential gene triggers population collapse in Drosophila 97%
- Neo-sex chromosome evolution shapes sex-dependent asymmetrical introgression barrier 96%
- Upgraded CRISPR/Cas9 Tools for Tissue-Specific Mutagenesis in Drosophila 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene-by-environment interactions influence the fitness cost of gene copy-number variation in yeast 92%
- Polycomb response elements reduce leaky expression of Cas9 under temperature-inducible Hsp70Bb promoter in Drosophila melanogaster 92%
- Unusual predominance of maintenance DNA methylation in Spirodela polyrhiza 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rad51, Rad54, and ZMM proteins antagonize the mismatch repair system to promote fertility of budding yeast intraspecies hybrid zygotes 95%
- Translesion DNA synthesis-driven mutagenesis in very early embryogenesis of fast cleaving embryos 94%
- A non-tethering role for the Drosophila Pol θ linker domain in promoting damage resolution 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.