Back

Dynamic strategic social learning in nest-building zebra finches and its generalisability

Breen, A. J.; Eckersley, T.; Camacho-Alpizar, A.; Lambert, C. T.; Balasubramanian, G.; Healy, S. D.; McElreath, R.; Guillette, L. M.

2025-08-12 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.06.06.658225 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animals often balance asocial and social information strategically, adjusting when and from whom they copy based on context. Yet the cognition driving this dynamic--and its broader implications--remains poorly understood. We tested whether zebra finches use a copy-if-dissatisfied strategy by manipulating the quality of their initial nest-building or reproductive experience, showing them a conspecific nest-builder, and tracking subsequent material choices. Builder-males were more likely to choose the demon-strated social material--particularly at first choice--if they had previously used low-quality material. Using cognitive modelling, we estimated how latent learning mechanisms shaped decisions, identifying two asocial and two social parameters. These estimates provide the first formal evidence for the cognitive basis of nest building. Forward simulations informed--but not predetermined--by these parameters approximated observed behaviour, supporting their causal role. We then used these parameters in exploratory simulations to test how choices might shift under novel payoff contexts. We found that payoff structure--not (dis)satisfaction--was the primary driver of social material use, though higher rewards did not proportionally increase copying. These exploratory simulation results offer preliminary insight into mechanisms underlying material-use variation. Our study illustrates how computational modelling can robustly link behaviour to underlying learning mechanisms and probe the generalisability of animal cognition--a rarity in this field.

Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.