Forecasting oncogene amplification and tumour suppressor deletion
Hernando, B.; Fernandez-Sanroman, A.; Cadiz, A.; Santamaria, P. G.; Gomez-Sanchez, D.; Escobar-Rey, M.; Chaves-Urbano, B.; Thompson, J. S.; Torres, M.; Ruiz de Garibay, G.; Adradas, V.; Alvarez, E.; The Pan Prostate Cancer Group, ; Tarabichi, M.; Lesluyes, T.; Coya, J. M.; Zugazagoitia, J.; Paz-Ares, L.; Macintyre, G.
Show abstract
Oncogene amplification and tumour suppressor deletion can drive tumour initiation, progression and treatment resistance. Detection at diagnosis often signals poor prognosis, but it can also enable opportunities for treatment with highly effective targeted therapies. Predicting the likelihood that a patient will acquire these driver alterations in the future using a genomic test represents an opportunity to realise the benefits of interventions earlier, potentially with preventative intent. Here, we present a forecasting framework that takes as input a DNA copy number profile and predicts whether the tumour will acquire an oncogene amplification or tumour suppressor deletion in the future. This framework leverages mutation rate estimates from the input tumour, alongside gene-specific selection coefficients derived from a large cohort of 7,880 tumours. We demonstrate feasibility using 7,042 single-time-point samples and longitudinally collected tumour pairs from 44 prostate and 100 lung cancers, identifying tumours that went on to acquire amplifications at a later time point with an average AUC of 0.87. We show potential clinical utility by forecasting poor prognosis in low-grade gliomas via CDK4/PDGFRA amplification or CDKN2A deletion, and osimertinib resistance in lung cancers via MET amplification. This study serves as a proof-of-concept for a new class of biomarker, wherein selective pressures and mutation-generating processes can be harnessed to anticipate future genomic alterations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative ensemble modelling of cetuximab sensitivity in colorectal cancer PDXs 97%
- The DiffInvex evolutionary model for conditional somatic selection identifies chemotherapy resistance genes in 10,000 cancer genomes 97%
- Identification of Relevant Genetic Alterations in Cancer using Topological Data Analysis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell cycle alterations associate with a redistribution of mutation rates across chromosomal domains in human cancers 96%
- Multi-modal digital pathology for colorectal cancer diagnosis by high-plex immunofluorescence imaging and traditional histology of the same tissue section 95%
- Multiplexed mosaic tumor models reveal natural phenotypic variations in drug response within and between populations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Driven Predictive Biomarker Discovery with Contrastive Learning to Improve Clinical Trial Outcomes 96%
- Single-cell lineage and transcriptome reconstruction of metastatic cancer reveals selection of aggressive hybrid EMT states 95%
- Multi-omic landscape of human gliomas from diagnosis to treatment and recurrence 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.