Focus on single gene effects limits discovery and interpretation of complex trait-associated variants
Lawrence, K. A.; Gjorgjieva, T.; Montgomery, S. B.
Show abstract
Standard QTL mapping approaches consider variant effects on a single gene at a time, despite abundant evidence for allelic pleiotropy, where a single variant can affect multiple genes simultaneously. While allelic pleiotropy describes variant effects on both local and distal genes or a mixture of molecular effects on a single gene, here we specifically investigate allelic expression "proxitropy": where a single variant influences the expression of multiple, neighboring genes. We introduce a multi-gene eQTL mapping framework--cis-principal component expression QTL (cis-pc eQTL or pcQTL)--to identify variants associated with shared axes of expression variation across a cluster of neighboring genes. We perform pcQTL mapping in 13 GTEx human tissues and discover novel loci undetected by single-gene approaches. In total, we identify an average of 1396 pcQTLs/tissue, 27% of which were not discovered by single-gene methods. These novel pcQTL colocalized with an additional 142 GWAS trait-associated variants and increased the number of colocalizations by 34% over single-gene QTL mapping. These findings highlight that moving beyond single-gene-at-a-time approaches toward multi-gene methods can offer a more comprehensive view of gene regulation and complex trait-associated variation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared and distinct molecular effects of regulatory genetic variants provide insight into mechanisms of distal enhancer-promoter communication 98%
- Haplotype-aware modeling of cis-regulatory effects highlights the gaps remaining in eQTL data 98%
- The molecular basis, genetic control and pleiotropic effects of local gene co-expression 98%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.