Central nervous system atlas of larval zebrafish constructed using the morphology of single excitatory and inhibitory neurons
Du, X.; Yue, Z.; Chen, M.; Li, W.; Chen, T.; Hu, H.; Wan, H.; Zhao, T.; Zhong, Y.; Ning, X.; Zheng, X.; Ren, H.; Wang, R.; Zhao, R.; Peng, X.; Jia, Z.; Jin, C.; Huang, J.; Deng, W.; Qian, L.; Wang, L.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, W.; Shen, X.; Shen, X.; Qiu, X.; Zhao, Q.; Li, D.; Chen, L.; Wang, S.; Gong, Y.; Li, Y.; Mu, Y.; Ji, P.; He, J.; Wang, Y.; Du, J.
Show abstract
Comprehensive single-neuron morphology mapping is fundamental to deciphering the brain architecture and function. While invertebrate animal models including Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster have achieved complete neuronal maps primarily via electron microscopy reconstructions1-8, vertebrate efforts remain limited in spatial coverage and/or lack of cell type annotation9-18. Here, we present a nervous system-wide, cellular-resolution neuronal morphology atlas for the vertebrate animal model of larval zebrafish, annotated with excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) neurotransmitter identity and dendrite-axon polarity. The dataset, collected from over 13,400 individual animals, encompasses more than 20,000 neurons spanning the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral ganglia (covering [~] 25% of all E and I neurons in the brain), all integrated into a whole-body common physical space with detailed neuroanatomical parcellations. It reveals over 500 hierarchically classified neuronal morphotypes and enables the construction of directed and weighted inter-cell-type and interregional connectomes, bridging large-scale cellular anatomy with circuit- and system-level organization across spatial scales. Neuronal projection analyses reveal differences between E and I neurons in ipsilateral-contralateral and ascending-descending projection preferences, the combination of projection modes for bilateral innervation, and the modular organization of projection patterns. Network analyses identify structured connectivity motifs, network hubs, and characteristic multimodal sensorimotor pathways. Hosted on the open interactive platform ZExplorer, this resource enables exploration, querying, and integration of multimodal neural data, laying a foundation for understanding functional circuits, developing models, and conducting hypothesis-driven research of the zebrafish brain.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Retinal input influences pace of neurogenesis but not cell-type configuration of the visual forebrain 97%
- Cellular and transcriptional trajectories of neural fate specification in sea anemone uncover two modes of adult neurogenesis 97%
- Three-dimensional molecular architecture of mouse organogenesis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Topographic connectivity and cellular profiling reveal detailed input pathways and functionally distinct cell types in the subthalamic nucleus 96%
- Parvalbumin expression identifies subicular principal cells with high projection specificity 96%
- The olivocerebellar system differentially encodes the effect sensory events exert on behavior 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epigenetically distinct synaptic architecture in clonal compartments in the teleostean dorsal pallium 97%
- Transcriptomic encoding of sensorimotor transformation in the midbrain 96%
- High-throughput mapping of single-cell molecular and projection architecture of neurons by retrograde barcoded labelling 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A telencephalon cell type atlas for goldfish reveals diversity in the evolution of spatial structure and cell types 98%
- Spatially-resolved single-cell atlas of ascidian endostyle provides insights into the origin of vertebrate pharyngeal organs 97%
- Integrated single-cell transcriptomic and epigenetic analyses of cell-state transition and lineage commitment in the embryonic mouse cerebellum 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.