Back

Effectiveness and Challenges of Digital Tools Implementation for Enhancing Infectious Disease Surveillance Data Quality in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Protocol

Olu-Abiodun, O.; Faturoti, A.; Adepoju, A.; Adeloye, D.; Adebiyi, A.; Abiodun, O.

2025-06-06 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.06.06.25328932 medRxiv
Show abstract

Prospero ID-1023840 BackgroundMonitoring infectious diseases is essential for preventing and controlling outbreaks, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where issues like poor infrastructure, lack of trained staff, and limited resources can make data collection challenging. Digital tools such as mobile health apps and electronic reporting systems show promise in addressing these problems. However, its still unclear how well these tools actually improve the quality of data, like how quickly information is reported, how accurate it is, whether all necessary data is captured, and if the data can be trusted. ObjectivesThis review aims to explore three main points: (1) how digital tools influence the quality of infectious disease data in LMICs; (2) what factors help or hinder their successful use; and (3) what recommendations can be made for policymakers and health workers based on the evidence. MethodsWe will search several databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, CINAHL, and Google Scholar, for studies published from January 2000 to April 2025. To further reduce publication bias, we will search the following institutional repositories (African Health Observatory and Indian Council of Medical Research). We are interested in studies like randomised trials, quasi-experimental studies, and mixed-methods evaluations that compare digital solutions with traditional methods in LMIC settings. Data extracted will include outcomes such as delays in reporting, error rates, and completeness, and factors like infrastructure and workforce readiness. The quality of each study will be assessed using ROBINS-I. Where possible, we will combine data statistically using meta-analysis and analyse qualitative findings for deeper insights. Expected OutcomesThis review will offer a clear picture of how effective digital tools are in improving disease surveillance. It will identify common challenges, such as poor connectivity and issues with system integration, and emphasise factors that lead to success, like proper training and government support. Overall, the findings will help shape better strategies to strengthen digital disease monitoring, finally contributing to stronger global health security.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.