Back

Oxidative DNA Damage Drives Apoptotic Photoreceptor Loss in NMNAT1-Associated Inherited Retinal Degeneration: A Therapeutic Opportunity

Zhang, H.; Valestil, K.; Pierce, E. A.

2025-06-06 cell biology
10.1101/2025.06.05.658162 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Early-onset inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs), such as Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) caused by pathogenic variants in the NMNAT1 gene, lead to severe vision loss in children. Despite its ubiquitous expression, reduced NMNAT1 function primarily affects photoreceptor cells (PRs) of the retina, yet the mechanisms underlying their heightened vulnerability remain incompletely understood. Here, we demonstrate that reduced NMNAT1 enzyme function due to the p.V9M mutation leads to DNA damage in PRs, characterized by the progressive accumulation of the oxidative DNA adduct 8-oxo-dG in Nmnat1V9M/V9M mutant mice. Cells with oxidative DNA damage also demonstrate DNA double-strand breaks, as evidenced by co-staining with antibodies to phosphorylated H2AX ({gamma}H2A.X). This DNA damage correlates with apoptosis-driven PR degeneration, as evidenced by caspase-9 activation and TUNEL staining in the PRs of the Nmnat1V9M/V9M mutant mice, while alternative cell death pathways such as necroptosis and parthanatos were not significantly activated. Treatment with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) effectively reduced oxidative DNA damage and retinal immune responses, mitigated apoptosis, and preserved cone PRs. Longitudinal assessment via optical coherence tomography (OCT) and electroretinography (ERG) revealed sustained structural and functional protection in NAC-treated mice. These findings establish oxidative DNA damage as a key driver of PR degeneration in the Nmnat1V9M/V9M model and highlight NACs potential as a causal gene variant-independent therapeutic strategy for NMNAT1-associated IRD and potentially other IRDs in which oxidative DNA damage contributes to disease pathogenesis.

Published in Cell Death & Disease (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.