Back

Simultaneous cortical responses to multiple written words

Chauhan, V. S.; McCook, K.; Latif, M.; White, A. L.

2025-06-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.06.05.658099 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We have learned much about the brain regions that support reading by measuring neuronal responses to single words, but we know little about how the brain processes multiple words simultaneously. This fMRI study fills that gap by varying the number of English words presented while holding the amount of visual stimulation constant. We adapted the "simultaneous suppression" paradigm, which has demonstrated that the response to multiple stimuli presented simultaneously is typically smaller than the sum of responses to the same stimuli presented sequentially. On each trial, participants viewed rapid sequences of three frames. Each frame contained two character strings, most of which were pseudo-letters with visual features matched to familiar letters. The experimental conditions differed in the number of English words in the sequence: zero words; one word; two words sequentially; or two words simultaneously. Behaviorally, participants performed worse at detecting two words presented simultaneously than sequentially. In the brain, the BOLD response increased linearly with the number of words presented in several reading-related regions of the left hemisphere: the inferior frontal sulcus, the intraparietal sulcus, the superior temporal sulcus, and text-selective occipito-temporal regions. But the mean response magnitudes did not differ between sequential and simultaneous presentation of two words. Nonetheless, the sensitivity of ventral temporal text-selective regions to two words lexical frequencies was attenuated by simultaneous presentation. This suggests that words were processed less deeply when they competed simultaneously. Our new paradigm, therefore, reveals processing capacity limits in the reading circuitry.

Published in Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · published here
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.6%
3
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
4
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
7
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.2%
9
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
10
Neurobiology of Language
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.9%
13
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
16
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
20
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%