Directional Drift in Biologically Meaningful Vector Planes: A Proposed Geometric Framework for Early Detection of Subthreshold Disease
Prakash, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundMost conventional diagnostic systems rely on fixed thresholds to differentiate disease states from normal. However, early pathological changes may begin before these thresholds are crossed. Therefore, a system that works in this pre-threshold state can potentially lead to earlier diagnosis. ObjectiveTo propose and evaluate a geometric framework that models early disease as a directional drift from a physiological plane to a pathological plane, allowing for pre-threshold detection using biologically interpretable variables. MethodsIn this modeling study on synthetic data derived from published clinical trends, two clinically meaningful variables were used to define a 2D feature space. The model was applied to a synthetic dataset of 4000 eyes divided into four phenotypes: normal stable (NS), early disease stable (ED_S), early disease progressive (ED_P), and pre-threshold progressive (PT_P). A physiological plane was constructed using range-normalized values from the NS group. A canonical disease vector was derived from the ED_P group. Each subjects follow-up data was transformed into a subject-specific drift vector, and the Composite Drift Score (CDS) was calculated as the product of directional alignment (Directional Emphasis Multiplier, DEM) and a Magnitude-to-Noise Ratio (MNR). ResultsCDS increased significantly over follow-ups in both ED_P and PT_P, distinguishing them from the two stable cohorts (p<0.001). DEM and MNR components showed consistent trends, with progressive cases exhibiting higher alignment with the disease vector and supra-noise magnitude of change. Visual and statistical analyses confirmed early drift detection even within numerically normal ranges. ConclusionIn this early modeling study based on simulation data, we could quantify the directional drift with a unitless, interpretable metric (CDS) and its derivatives. It showed similar trends in pre-threshold groups as early disease groups, showing potential for further evaluation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Rett syndrome severity estimation with the BioStamp nPoint using interactions between heart rate variability and body movement 93%
- Subtyping of common complex diseases and disorders by integrating heterogeneous data. Identifying clusters among women with lower urinary tract symptoms in the LURN study 93%
- Towards development of a statistical framework to evaluate myotonic dystrophy type 1 mRNA biomarkers in the context of a clinical trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information 93%
- Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: A case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases 93%
- Trajectories: a framework for detecting temporal clinical event sequences from health data standardized to the OMOP Common Data Model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circular functional analysis of OCT data for precise identification of structural phenotypes in the eye 93%
- On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence 93%
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 93%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 92%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.