Back

Brief assessment of cognition in immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome

Wang, B.; Kuznetsova, V.; Lui, E.; Li, A.; Loi, S. M.; Roberts, S.; D'Aprano, F.; Kalincik, T.; Harrison, S.; Dowling, M. R.; Dickinson, M.; Walterfang, M.; Velakoulis, D.; Anderson, M. A.; Malpas, C.

2025-06-06 neurology
10.1101/2025.06.05.25329077 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImmune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a common acute adverse event of chimeric antigen T-cell (CAR-T) therapy associated with a range of neurological and cognitive symptoms. Recent evidence has highlighted that cognitive changes in ICANS may predate changes in the current standard cognitive screening instrument. This study aimed to develop a novel screening instrument sensitive to ICANS-related cognitive dysfunction. MethodsPatients were administered a 21-item bedside cognitive screening instrument (the Neuropsychiatry Unit Cognitive Assessment Tool) followed by an inpatient neuropsychological assessment. A cognitive screening index was computed by summing the beside items that maximally differentiated between ICANS and non-ICANS patients. A separate neuropsychological index was also derived. ResultsAmong the 50 patients included, 26 (52%) had ICANS at assessment. Six screening tests and five neuropsychological tests demonstrated acceptable clinical utility for indices computation (AUC>0.70). ICANS patients had lower scores on both the cognitive screening index (p<.001) and the neuropsychological index (p< .001) than non-ICANS patients. The cognitive screening index (AUC=0.80) and the neuropsychological index (AUC=0.81) achieved acceptable clinical utility. Although there was no significant difference between the AUCs of the two indices (p=.765), hierarchical logistic regression showed that the neuropsychological index improved the classification of ICANS patients (p<.05). ConclusionThe cognitive screening index can reliably discriminate between ICANS and non-ICANS patients, but neuropsychological examination provides more detailed cognitive characterisation in ICANS. Further validation of the cognitive screening index will inform practice in this emerging area of clinical need.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.