Brief assessment of cognition in immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome
Wang, B.; Kuznetsova, V.; Lui, E.; Li, A.; Loi, S. M.; Roberts, S.; D'Aprano, F.; Kalincik, T.; Harrison, S.; Dowling, M. R.; Dickinson, M.; Walterfang, M.; Velakoulis, D.; Anderson, M. A.; Malpas, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundImmune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a common acute adverse event of chimeric antigen T-cell (CAR-T) therapy associated with a range of neurological and cognitive symptoms. Recent evidence has highlighted that cognitive changes in ICANS may predate changes in the current standard cognitive screening instrument. This study aimed to develop a novel screening instrument sensitive to ICANS-related cognitive dysfunction. MethodsPatients were administered a 21-item bedside cognitive screening instrument (the Neuropsychiatry Unit Cognitive Assessment Tool) followed by an inpatient neuropsychological assessment. A cognitive screening index was computed by summing the beside items that maximally differentiated between ICANS and non-ICANS patients. A separate neuropsychological index was also derived. ResultsAmong the 50 patients included, 26 (52%) had ICANS at assessment. Six screening tests and five neuropsychological tests demonstrated acceptable clinical utility for indices computation (AUC>0.70). ICANS patients had lower scores on both the cognitive screening index (p<.001) and the neuropsychological index (p< .001) than non-ICANS patients. The cognitive screening index (AUC=0.80) and the neuropsychological index (AUC=0.81) achieved acceptable clinical utility. Although there was no significant difference between the AUCs of the two indices (p=.765), hierarchical logistic regression showed that the neuropsychological index improved the classification of ICANS patients (p<.05). ConclusionThe cognitive screening index can reliably discriminate between ICANS and non-ICANS patients, but neuropsychological examination provides more detailed cognitive characterisation in ICANS. Further validation of the cognitive screening index will inform practice in this emerging area of clinical need.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequency of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 350 studies 90%
- Boston criteria v2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy without hemorrhage: An MRI-neuropathological validation study 90%
- Primary progressive aphasia in Italian and English: a cross-linguistic cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of the Reliability, Responsiveness, and Meaningfulness of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) for Lysosomal Storage Disorders 93%
- Central and peripheral nervous system complications of COVID-19: A prospective tertiary center cohort with 3-month follow-up 92%
- Serum anti-NMDA-receptor antibodies and cognitive function after ischemic stroke (PROSCIS-B) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-reported health, neuropsychological tests and biomarkers in fully recovered COVID-19 patients vs patients with post-COVID cognitive symptoms: a pilot study 92%
- Prevalence of DSM-5 mild and major neurocognitive disorder in India: Results from the LASI-DAD 91%
- The negative impact of COVID-19 on working memory revealed using a rapid online quiz 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suggestibility in functional neurological disorder: A meta-analysis 90%
- Serum neurofilament light chain predicts long-term prognosis in Guillain-Barré syndrome patients 89%
- Unravelling the influence of affective stimulation on functional neurological symptoms: A pilot experiment examining potential mechanisms 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.