Localization of Realistic Spatial Patches of Complex Source Activity in MEG
Giri, A.; Hecker, L.; Mosher, J.; Adler, A.; Pantazis, D.
Show abstract
Accurate localization of neural sources in Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG) is essential for advancing clinical and research applications in neuroscience. Traditional approaches like dipole fitting (e.g., MUSIC, RAP-MUSIC) are limited to discrete focal sources, while distributed source imaging methods (e.g., MNE, sLORETA) assume sources distributed across the cortical surface. These methods, however, often fail to capture sources with complex spatial extents, limiting their accuracy in realistic settings. To address these limitations, we introduce PATCH-AP, an enhanced version of the Alternating Projection (AP) method that effectively localizes both discrete and spatially extended sources. We evaluated PATCH-AP against leading source localization methods, including distributed source imaging techniques (MNE, sLORETA), traditional dipole fitting (AP), and recent extended source methods (Convexity-Champagne (CC), FLEX-AP). PATCH-AP consistently outperformed these methods in simulations, achieving lower Earth Movers Distance (EMD) scores--a metric indicating closer alignment with the true source distribution. In tests with real MEG data from a face perception task, PATCH-AP demonstrated high alignment with the fusiform face area, a region critical for face processing. These results highlight PATCH-APs potential to enhance source localization accuracy, promising significant advancements in neuroscience research and clinical diagnostics.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust Estimation of Noise for Electromagnetic Brain Imaging with the Champagne Algorithm 98%
- Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources 98%
- NLGC: Network Localized Granger Causality with Application to MEG Directional Functional Connectivity Analysis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.