Back

Designing a broad-spectrum four-helix bundle targeting different strains of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor Binding Domains with ACE2-like binding interface

Nie, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Yin, H.; Chen, K.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J. Z. H.; Zhan, J.; Qi, J.; Li, W.; Zhang, C.

2025-06-06 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.06.04.657798 bioRxiv
Show abstract

One major strategy for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to evade antibody drugs or preventive vaccines is high mutation rate of the spike receptor binding domain (RBD). Because variable RBDs of different SARS-CoV-2 strains must bind to the same human receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) for viral cell entry and infection, we hypothesize that designing a protein with the same or very similar hACE2 binding interface might have a broad-spectrum effect against various SARS-CoV-2 strains. The designed protein binds specifically to the WT-RBD (with micromolar affinity) but not to RBDs from other SARS-CoV-2 strains. However, two rounds of the E. coli display and Magnetic Cell Sorting (MACS) selection are sufficient to yield a protein named CYN1 with nanomolar binding affinities not only to the WT-RBD but also to those of Omicron BA.1, XBB.1.16, and JN.1. Molecular dynamics simulations and free-energy hotspot analysis revealed that CYN1s broader spectrum capability stems from its engagement of essentially all ACE2 hotspot residues critical for WT-RBD binding, unlike the designed protein. The discovery of CYN1, differing by only four mutations from the designed protein, confirms that targeting the small interface of human viral receptors--rather than the entire receptor--offers a viable strategy for developing broad-spectrum inhibitors. This approach minimizes potential off-target effects arising from receptor multifunctionality.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Discovery
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
3
Science Bulletin
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.6%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
7
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
9
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
10
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
11
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
15
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
19
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Cell Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
23
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
25
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
National Science Review
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
29
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%