Back

Comparing phenotypic manifolds with Kompot: Detecting differential abundance and gene expression at single-cell resolution

Otto, D. J.; Arriaga-Gomez, E.; Thieme, E.; Yang, R.; Lee, S. C.; Setty, M.

2025-06-07 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.03.657769 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-cell studies are frequently designed to compare across conditions such as health and disease. However, existing computational approaches typically rely on grouping cells into discrete populations before making comparisons, which can limit resolution for detecting state-dependent changes. Here, we introduce Kompot, a statistical framework for comparative analysis of multi-condition single-cell data. Kompot quantifies both differential abundance, capturing how cells redistribute across the phenotypic space, and differential expression, identifying condition-specific transcriptional changes that may be localized, heterogeneous, or oppositely regulated across states. By modeling cell density and gene expression as continuous functions over a shared cell-state representation, Kompot enables single-cell-resolution inference with principled uncertainty estimates, without requiring predefined clusters or cell types. Applying Kompot to aging murine bone marrow, we identified a continuum of shifts in hematopoietic stem cell and mature cell states, transcriptional remodeling of monocytes independent of compositional changes, and divergent regulation of oxidative stress response genes across cell types. We demonstrate the utility of Kompot in disease settings by identifying cell-state and gene expression changes associated with improved efficacy of combinatorial immunotherapy in melanoma. Additionally, Kompot enables multi-sample comparative analysis by accounting for sample-to-sample heterogeneity. By capturing both global and cell-state-specific effects of perturbation, the Kompot framework is broadly applicable to dissecting condition-specific effects in complex single-cell landscapes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.