Back

Antimicrobial stewardship in animal health: experience-based co-design framework to capture progress and accelerate improvement

Hewson, K. A.; Binet, M.; Richards, K.; Gleeson, B.; Adsett, S.; Tuckett, G.; Kennedy, B.; Jenner, R.; Courtice, J.; Batterham, T.; Page, S. W.; Britton, S.

2025-06-10 microbiology
10.1101/2025.06.03.657743 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is essential for mitigating antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in animal health but implementing national initiatives is challenging due to diverse influencing factors and the need for context-specific approaches. An Animal AMS Practice Group, comprised of individuals with lived experience overseeing AMS in various animal health contexts was engaged, and through an experience-based co-design approach created a comprehensive AMS Framework that captures progress and supports tangible improvements in AMS practices in each context. The Framework supported a cross-sectoral pilot assessment that helped users identify progress, areas for improvement, and contextualise antimicrobial usage and AMR data, while also motivating further AMS efforts. Despite common barriers to sharing sensitive data, participants willingly shared AMS results for benchmarking and publication. The process demonstrated that co-design coupled with peer learning and expert support are essential to ensuring AMS tools are utilised in practice. Several participants incorporated the Framework into routine practice, with some using it to drive sector-level AMS action. The resulting Framework offers an adaptable, scalable entry point for AMS efforts and a platform for setting meaningful improvement goals. It supports broader opportunities for national-level AMS assessments and strategy development. Impact StatementThis research offers a practical, scalable approach to improving AMS in animal health. By embedding behaviour change into the project through an experience-based co-design process, rather than expecting it to occur afterward, veterinarians, animal managers, and other frontline professionals defined what good AMS looks like in their context and identified achievable actions to improve daily practices that aligned across diverse animal health settings. The resulting AMS Framework provides a clear, accessible starting point for those overseeing daily AMS activities to benchmark practices, set meaningful goals, and track progress, while also informing national-level prioritisation and decision-making. This user-led model demonstrates that when AMS tools are co-developed with those who will use them and users are empowered to shape the projects design and outputs, the resulting tools are more likely to be adopted, shared, and sustained.

Published in Cambridge Prisms: Antimicrobial Resistance · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.1%
2
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
3
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.3%
5
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
6
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
7
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
8
BMJ Paediatrics Open
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
9
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
10
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
11
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
13
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
14
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
17
Journal of Dairy Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
18
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
19
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
20
International Journal for Parasitology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
21
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
22
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%