Hierarchical diversification of instinctual behavior neurons by lineage, birth order, and sex
Elkahlah, N.; Lin, Y.; Shirangi, T. R.; Clowney, E. J.
Show abstract
Brain regions that regulate motivated behaviors, including the vertebrate hypothalamus and arthropod cerebrum, house bespoke neural circuits dedicated to perceptual and internal regulation of many behavioral states1,2. These circuits are built to purpose from complex sets of cell types whose patterning has been challenging to elucidate. Here, we developed methods in Drosophila melanogaster to embed well-studied neurons that regulate mating in the transcriptional contexts of the neuronal lineages that generate them3-5. By comparing transcription within and between lineages, we identified a large set of transcription factors expressed in complex combinations that delineate cerebral hemilineages - classes of postmitotic neurons born from the same stem cell and sharing Notch status6,7. Hemilineages comprise the major anatomic classes in the cerebrum8-10 and these transcription factors are required to generate their gross features. We show that subtypes of the same hemilineage can provide a common computational module to circuits regulating different drives, and identify an orthogonal set of transcription factors that stratify hemilineage subtypes of differing birth order. Our findings suggest that distinct sets of transcription factors operate in a hierarchical system to build, diversify, and sexually differentiate lineally-related neurons that compose motivated behaviors circuits. By linking developmental patterning to separable transcriptional axes that produce gross versus fine aspects of information flow, we provide a logical framework for cerebral control of diverse drives.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.