Signatures of Motion: Decomposition of Adaptive Morphing Flight in Harris' Hawks
France, L. A.; Shelton, J.; Heerenbrink, M. K.; Brighton, C.; Taylor, G. K.
Show abstract
Birds outperform engineered aircraft with exceptional maneuverability, achieved by continuously morphing their wings and tails in flight. Yet the coordination and control of these shape changes remain poorly understood. Using high-speed motion capture of Harris hawks, we analyzed 289,000 wing-tail configurations in over 2000 flights and identified four fundamental shape change patterns, or "morphing shape modes", that capture over 96% of wing and tail variation. Further modes reflect subtle but critical fine-tuning, in line with known morphing control mechanics. The hawks morphing flight is highly structured yet flexible, and we find adaptive strategies in response to obstacles, added weight, with maturity, while each individual shows unique morphing signatures. Our approach defines a shared kinematic morphospace for hawk flight, and more broadly a framework that enables future comparative biomechanics, bio-inspired design, and for interpreting high-dimensional natural motion.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Obstacle avoidance in aerial pursuit 96%
- Multisensory integration in Anopheles mosquito swarms: The role of visual and acoustic information in mate tracking and collision avoidance 92%
- Can a fish learn to ride a bicycle? Sensorimotor adaptation to destabilizing dynamics in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia virescens 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliable reconstruction of cricket song from biophysical models and preserved specimens 93%
- A biomechanical model for the relation between bite force and mandibular opening angle in arthropods 92%
- Rough substrates constrain walking speed in ants through modulation of stride frequency and not stride length 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.