Back

Mapping the Transcriptional Landscape of Drug Responses in Primary Human Cells Using High-Throughput DRUG-seq

Baugh, L.; Vigneau, S.; Sridhar, S.; Boswell, S.; Pilitsis, G.; Bradley, J.; Allen, O.; Rand, L.; Riccardi, A.; Roach, K.; Lema, K.; Ergun, A.

2025-06-07 systems biology
10.1101/2025.06.03.657593 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To advance our understanding of drug action in physiologically-relevant systems, we developed a high-throughput transcriptomic atlas of compound responses in primary human cell types. Leveraging the scalable and cost-effective Digital RNA with the pertUrbation of Genes (DRUG-seq) assay, we profiled gene expression responses to 89 pharmacologically-active compounds across six concentrations in four distinct primary cell types: aortic smooth muscle cells (AoSMCs), skeletal muscle myoblasts (SkMMs), dermal fibroblasts, and melanocytes. Through rigorous quality control and normalization, we generated reproducible and cell type-resolved transcriptomic signatures, enabling the discovery of both shared and divergent regulatory programs. This dataset revealed core cellular responses, such as brefeldin A-mediated ER stress across all cell types, as well as lineage-specific effects, including dexamethasone-induced hypoxia signaling in AoSMCs, complex inflammatory responses linked to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition pathways in SkMMs, TGF-{beta}-modulated states in fibroblasts, and dabrafenib-driven transcriptional shifts towards quiescence in melanocytes. By integrating systematic perturbations with primary models, this dataset serves as a resource for building systems-level models of drug response and mechanism. Ultimately, we aim to accelerate predictive pharmacology by enabling high-throughput data generation grounded in human biology and readily usable by artificial intelligence models.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.