Back

Stochastic Approximator of Motor Threshold (SAMT) for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Online Software and Its Performance in Clinical Studies

Wang, B.; Shah, V. U.; Koponen, L. M.; Neacsiu, A. D.; Daskalakis, Z. J.; Fitzgerald, P. B.; Appelbaum, L. G.; Choi, J. Y.; Gerlus, N.; Li, Y.; Hadas, I.; Sun, Y.; Poorganji, M.; Daniels, H.; Rodriguez, K.; Gotsis, E. S.; Bailey, N. W.; Raveendran, J.; Brinley, S. K.; Gallo, A. T.; Goetz, S. M.; Peterchev, A. V.

2025-06-05 neurology
10.1101/2025.06.03.25328918 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe motor threshold (MT) plays a central role in probing brain excitability and individualizing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Previously, we proposed stochastic approximation (SA) as a new method for determining TMS MT and demonstrated its excellent speed and accuracy via simulations. SA also has low computational requirements and is robust to potential model flaws. ObjectiveThis project aimed to develop a practical SA thresholding method and assess its performance in clinical studies. MethodsThe SA thresholding method was implemented as an online software application--SAMT (Stochastic Approximator of MT)--that incorporated features for detection of inaccurate MT estimation. Two ongoing clinical studies use SAMT and have collected 281 finger muscle MTs from 124 participants to date. SAMTs misestimation detection method marked MTs of 7 thresholding trials as inaccurate, and SAMTs performance in the remaining 274 trials was assessed by comparing the MT at each step to the threshold estimated by fitting a sigmoidal probability distribution to the complete muscle response data from the session. ResultsBy the 25th TMS pulse, 99% of the SAMT MTs deviated by less than 3.0% (relative) and 1.3% of maximum stimulator output (absolute) from the corresponding fitted sigmoid thresholds and were within their 95% confidence intervals. ConclusionsWe provide the TMS community with a new motor thresholding tool, SAMT. Combined with the prior simulation results, the experimental assessment presented here supports the practicality and accuracy of the SA thresholding method and the SAMT software.

Published in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.