Stochastic Approximator of Motor Threshold (SAMT) for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Online Software and Its Performance in Clinical Studies
Wang, B.; Shah, V. U.; Koponen, L. M.; Neacsiu, A. D.; Daskalakis, Z. J.; Fitzgerald, P. B.; Appelbaum, L. G.; Choi, J. Y.; Gerlus, N.; Li, Y.; Hadas, I.; Sun, Y.; Poorganji, M.; Daniels, H.; Rodriguez, K.; Gotsis, E. S.; Bailey, N. W.; Raveendran, J.; Brinley, S. K.; Gallo, A. T.; Goetz, S. M.; Peterchev, A. V.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe motor threshold (MT) plays a central role in probing brain excitability and individualizing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Previously, we proposed stochastic approximation (SA) as a new method for determining TMS MT and demonstrated its excellent speed and accuracy via simulations. SA also has low computational requirements and is robust to potential model flaws. ObjectiveThis project aimed to develop a practical SA thresholding method and assess its performance in clinical studies. MethodsThe SA thresholding method was implemented as an online software application--SAMT (Stochastic Approximator of MT)--that incorporated features for detection of inaccurate MT estimation. Two ongoing clinical studies use SAMT and have collected 281 finger muscle MTs from 124 participants to date. SAMTs misestimation detection method marked MTs of 7 thresholding trials as inaccurate, and SAMTs performance in the remaining 274 trials was assessed by comparing the MT at each step to the threshold estimated by fitting a sigmoidal probability distribution to the complete muscle response data from the session. ResultsBy the 25th TMS pulse, 99% of the SAMT MTs deviated by less than 3.0% (relative) and 1.3% of maximum stimulator output (absolute) from the corresponding fitted sigmoid thresholds and were within their 95% confidence intervals. ConclusionsWe provide the TMS community with a new motor thresholding tool, SAMT. Combined with the prior simulation results, the experimental assessment presented here supports the practicality and accuracy of the SA thresholding method and the SAMT software.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimized Monophasic Pulses with Equivalent Electric Field for Rapid-Rate Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 96%
- Three Novel Methods for Determining Motor Threshold with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Outperform Conventional Procedures 96%
- TAP: Targeting and analysis pipeline for optimization and verification of coil placement in transcranial magnetic stimulation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation of Voluntary Movement-related Cortical Activity in Humans 92%
- Identifiability analysis and noninvasive online estimation of the first-order neural activation dynamics in the brain with closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation 91%
- Accurate Identification of Motoneuron Discharges from Ultrasound Images Across the Full Muscle Cross-Section 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated search of stimulation targets with closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation 96%
- Efficient high-resolution TMS mapping of the human motor cortex by nonlinear regression 96%
- Recognizing EEG responses to active TMS vs. sham stimulations in different TMS-EEG datasets: a machine learning approach 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kilohertz Transcranial Magnetic Perturbation (kTMP): A New Non-invasive Method to Modulate Cortical Excitability 95%
- I-Spin live: An open-source software based on blind-source separation for real-time decoding of motor unit activity in humans 93%
- Biologically plausible phosphene simulation forthe differentiable optimization of visual corticalprostheses 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.