The Safety Action Feedback and Engagement (SAFE) Loop: Initial Testing and Refinement of a Novel Intervention to Enhance Hospital Incident Reporting and Patient Safety
Seferian, E.; Berdahl, C. T.; Coleman, B.; Leang, D.; Cohen, T.; Qureshi, N.; McCleskey, S. G.; Kaiser, K.; Grissinger, M.; Kanji, F.; Henreid, A. J.; Carrascoza-Bolanos, J.; Daniels, L.; Abarca, O.; De La Cruz, P.; Truong, B. T.; Nuckols, T. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundVoluntary incident reporting has improved safety in many high-risk industries, but several barriers have limited its effectiveness in hospitals. Designed to overcome these barriers, the novel Safety Action Feedback and Engagement (SAFE) Loop: (1) obtains input from nurses about patient safety problems; (2) invites nursing units to select a Target Event to focus on; (3) teaches nurses to write more informative incident reports; (4) prompts nurses to report Target Events for a designated period; (5) standardizes investigative procedures to support mitigation plans; and (6) provides feedback to nurses about contributing factors and mitigation plans. We aimed to refine the SAFE Loop through iterative testing. MethodsThis study reflected Stage I of behavioral intervention development. At a large U.S. academic hospital, we first conducted proof-of-concept testing on two nursing units. Leveraging these experiences and stakeholder input, we made iterative refinements to intervention design, implementation, and evaluation plans. Finally, we conducted structured pilot testing of the refined intervention on one nursing unit. While SAFE Loop could be applied to any patient safety problem, we focused on medication safety. ResultsIn initial proof-of-concept testing, implementation was feasible and nurses voiced substantial enthusiasm. Following the refinements, the structured pilot test reaffirmed SAFE Loop feasibility, including selecting a Target Event, training nurses in enhanced reporting methods, conducting investigative interviews, developing mitigation plans with nursing unit leaders, and distributing mitigation plans on the unit. The pilot also demonstrated the feasibility of extracting contributing factors from incident reports and surveying nurses about reporting and safety. Qualitative interviews after the pilot reaffirmed intervention acceptability. ConclusionsNurses found the SAFE Loop to be a promising strategy for improving patient safety. Testing and refinements to the SAFE Loop laid the groundwork for efficacy testing via an ongoing pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 95%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 94%
- Risks and challenges in COVID-19 infection prevention and control in a hospital setting: perspectives of healthcare workers in Thailand 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 95%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
- Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A System Dynamics Model for Effects of Workplace Violence and Clinician Burnout on Agitation Management in the Emergency Department 93%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 92%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Why is implementing remote monitoring in virtual wards (Hospital at Home) for people living with frailty so hard? Qualitative interview study 93%
- Is Point-of-Care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of Point-of-Care Polymerase Chain Reaction test for SARS-COV-2 91%
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.