Back

Adhesive implant interfaces prevent fibrosis by disrupting mechanobiological feedback

Jafari, M.; Aymon, B.; Hong, Y.; Shakiba, D.; Genin, G. M.; Zhao, X.; Alisafaei, F.

2025-06-03 biophysics
10.1101/2025.06.01.657311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fibrotic encapsulation around medical implants affects millions of patients annually. Current approaches targeting inflammation or implant material properties have failed clinically, but the mechanical origins of implant-induced fibrosis remain unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that directional imbalance of mechanical forces ("tension anisotropy") is the primary driver of fibroblast activation at implant-tissue interfaces, and that it can be eliminated through adhesive bonding strategies. Computational modeling reveals a mechanistic basis for successful adhesive anti-fibrotic interfaces: conventional sutured implants generate highly anisotropic stress fields between discrete suture anchor points that activate fibroblasts, while adhesive interfaces distribute forces isotropically, maintaining a mechanical environment that does not activate fibroblasts. In vivo experiments from the literature across multiple animal models confirm these predictions: as predicted, adhesive interfaces completely prevent fibrotic capsule formation for up to 12 weeks across diverse organs, while maintaining identical implant composition and geometry compared to sutured controls. Results establish tension anisotropy as a mechanical regulator of implant fibrosis and provide a mechanistic foundation explaining why adhesive interfaces succeed where all previous anti-fibrotic strategies have failed. By addressing the root mechanical cause of fibrosis, this mechanobiology-driven approach may enable a universal approach for preventing fibrosis across all categories of implantable medical devices. Significance statementMillions of patients suffer from medical device failure due to fibrotic encapsulation, in which a surgically implanted item such as pacemaker leads or a vascular graft loses function by becoming covered with scar tissue. Implants affixed to soft tissues by sutures are especially prone to this form of failure, but implants affixed with a recently invented adhesive are not. We present the discovery that directional imbalance of forces ("tension anisotropy") drives conversion of healing tissue into scar tissue. Conventional sutured implants create highly anisotropic stress fields between anchor points that activate fibroblasts, while adhesive interfaces distribute forces isotropically, attenuating scarring. This mechanistic insight explains why adhesive implant-tissue interfaces successfully prevent fibrotic capsule formation across multiple animal models and organ systems, where all previous anti-fibrotic approaches have failed. By addressing root mechanical causes of fibrotic remodeling, this discovery provides a pathway for clinical remediation of fibrotic encapsulation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Materials
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.5%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.4%
4
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
5
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
8
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.9%
10
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
11
Nature Physics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
12
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
13
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
15
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
20
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
22
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%