A social bee can learn a novel queen pheromone
Amsalem, E.; Hefetz, A.
Show abstract
Many pheromone responses are hardwired into the insects nervous system and are essential for critical behaviors such as mating, alarm signaling, and trail following. Workers of social species are also assumed to respond innately to queen pheromones, leading to changes in behavior and reproductive physiology. However, accumulating evidence highlights the potential roles of learning and experience in responses to pheromones regulating reproductive division of labor. To examine if the response to queen pheromone can be learned, we introduced bumblebee workers (Bombus terrestris) to a new queen pheromone by treating the queen daily with floral scents unfamiliar to the workers: either anisyl alcohol or methyl anthranilate. We allowed perfumed queens to establish colonies and examined worker attraction and egg laying following daily exposure to these odors without the queen, both with and without brood as context. Workers preferred the odor they grew up with and exposure to learned odors without the queen influenced worker egg laying only in the presence of brood, surprisingly resulting in increased egg laying. Our study demonstrates that workers can modify their behavior after learning an odor associated with their queen or nest. These learned odors function as context-dependent releaser pheromones, influencing worker attraction and egg-laying behavior.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A small family business: synergistic and additive effects of the queen and the brood on worker reproduction in a primitively eusocial bee 97%
- Sex- and caste-specific developmental responses to juvenile hormone in an ant with maternal caste determination 96%
- Loss of wings induces the expression of the worker-like phenotype in queens of a ponerine ant 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.