Back

Allele Specific Expression Quality Control Fills Critical Gap in Transcriptome Assisted Rare Variant Interpretation

Ganapathy, K. R.; Song, E.; Munro, D.; Torkamani, A.; Mohammadi, P.

2025-06-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.30.657086 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Allele-specific expression (ASE) captures the functional impact of genetic variation on transcription, offering a high-resolution view of cis-regulatory effects, but its quality can be diminished by technical, biological, and analysis artifacts. We introduce aseQC, a statistical framework that quantifies sample-level ASE quality in terms of the overall expected extra-binomial variation to exclude uncharacteristically noisy samples in a cohort to improve robustness of downstream analyses. Applying aseQC to a dataset of rare mendelian muscular disorders, successfully identified previously annotated low-quality cases demonstrating clinical genomic utility. When applied to 15,253 samples in extensively quality controlled GTEx project data, aseQC uncovered 563 low-quality samples that exhibit excessive allelic imbalance. We identify these to be associated with specific processing dates but not otherwise described adequately by any other quality control measures and metadata available in GTEx data. We show that these low-quality samples lead to 23.6 and 31.6 -fold increased ASE, and splicing outliers, degrading the performance of transcriptome analysis for rare variant interpretation. In contrast, we did not observe any adverse effect associated with inclusion of these samples in common-variant analysis using quantitative traits loci mapping. By enabling quick and reliable assessment of sample quality, aseQC presents a critical step for identifying subtle quality issues that remain critical for a successful analysis of rare variant effects using transcriptome data.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.