Back

Nanopore Assay for Fingerprinting DNA Binding and Quantifying Real-Time Cleavage by Catalytically Active Cas9 Enzyme

Nagpure, P.; Suresh, S.; Shet, D.; Soni, G. V.

2025-05-30 biophysics
10.1101/2025.05.30.656938 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nanopore sensing, a high-resolution DNA sequencing technology, is fast expanding into novel and exciting direction of probing specific DNA-enzyme interactions. Although proven excellent for detection of structural features of bare DNA, quantitative measurements on enzyme-DNA complexes and its real-time activity are lagging and only starting to emerge for long DNA templates. Signal-to-noise requirement and high translocation speeds make it difficult to detect protein bound on biologically relevant plasmid length DNA. To this end we report accurate position detection of a catalytically active Cas9 bound to its single or multiple target sites on the DNA. Protein position is fingerprinted using event charge deficit (ECD) based analysis of the high signal-to-noise electrical signals as the complex translocates through a glass nanopore. Using a time dependent assay, we quantify kinetics of the released products upon enzymatic cleavage of the target DNA by the wild-type Cas9 nuclease. Our approach enables the nanopore based single molecule sensing of DNA-protein complexes, for real-time monitoring of biochemical reactions. This may help understand protein binding & localization as well as improve Cas9 based targeting in genome engineering applications. TOC Figure O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=199 SRC="FIGDIR/small/656938v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9ea40org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f214e6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13a10bborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12067ab_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology (predicted rank #27) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.