Modulation of error sensitivity during motor learning across time, space and environment variability
Todorov, D. I.; Moulin, M.; Buch, E.; Quentin, R.
Show abstract
We never experience the exact same situation twice. In our dynamic and constantly changing environment, we continuously need to adapt our behavior, either due to external (e.g., a change of wind) or internal factors (e.g., muscle noise). Motor adaptation is the process of recalibration of movements in response to such perturbation. It activates when an agent needs to change their movement in response to a perceived error. It has been proposed that in order to perform motor adaptation, the brain continuously updates an error sensitivity signal that controls how much is learned from a past error. Such error sensitivity reflects the speed of learning, and understanding its dynamics is crucial to promoting efficient learning. In our experiment, healthy participants performed a visuomotor adaptation task requiring reaching multiple targets using a joystick. They experienced two periods of stable perturbations and two periods of random perturbations. In agreement with past research, we found that error sensitivity is lower in unstable environments. Moreover, error sensitivity is higher in a stable environment without perturbation than in a stable environment with perturbations. We observed a continuous increase of the error sensitivity within a stable perturbation environment. Finally, continuous spatial (across target locations) and temporal (across trials with same target) generalization of learning is present not only in stable but also in the random environment.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Online interference of declarative memory on fast and slow adaptive processes in force field motor learning 98%
- Sensitivity to Error During Visuomotor Adaptation is Similarly Modulated by Abrupt, Gradual and Random Perturbation Schedules 98%
- Implicit adaptation to mirror-reversal is in the correct coordinate system but the wrong direction 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methods matter: your measures of explicit and implicit processes in visuomotor adaptation affect your results 97%
- Acoustic stimulation increases implicit adaptation in sensorimotor adaptation 96%
- Different time scales of common-cause evidence shape multisensory integration, recalibration and motor adaptation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.