Back

KLHL41 orchestrates sarcomere assembly and size to drive skeletal muscle hypertrophy in vivo

Han, H.; Shi, J.; Bongiorno, A. H.; Mansur, A.; Widrick, J.; Tate, G.; Gill, S.; Karimi, E.; Granzier, H.; Moore, J. R.; Gupta, V. A.

2025-06-01 genetics
10.1101/2025.05.30.655367 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sarcomere assembly and growth are fundamental processes essential for the development, function, and repair of skeletal muscle. However, the mechanisms underlying sarcomere formation and assembly in vivo, which are critical for the formation of functional myofibers in vertebrates, remain poorly understood. Defects in sarcomeres contribute to muscle dysfunction in numerous genetic and acquired myopathies, yet the lack of a clear understanding of specific sarcomeric defects has hindered the development of effective therapies. Nemaline myopathy (NM) is caused by mutations in genes that primarily affect sarcomere structure and function. The disease is clinically heterogeneous, with the congenital form being the most severe. Using zebrafish models of congenital forms of NM, we investigated sarcomere assembly in vivo during skeletal muscle development to identify key steps contributing to myofibril formation and muscle growth under both normal and disease conditions. Our findings demonstrate that the gene encoding the sarcomeric protein KLHL41 plays a critical role in the formation and directional organization of new sarcomeres within developing myofibrils, facilitating both radial and longitudinal muscle growth. Dysregulation of sarcomeric proteins and impaired protein turnover in the KLHL41-NM zebrafish model resulted in the development of sarcomeric defects. Moreover, we show that the interaction between the KLHL41-troponin complex is essential for muscle growth and cross-bridge regulation in developing muscle. These studies address a significant gap in the understanding of sarcomeric defects in myopathies and will help guide the development of targeted therapies aimed at rescuing these processes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.