Back

U-shaped Association of Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio with Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Post-Catheter Ablation: A Cohort Study

Lin, M.; Wang, H.; Yang, N.; Chen, T.; Rong, B.; Han, W.; Zhong, J.; Zhang, K.

2025-06-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.05.30.25328684 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe prognostic value of lipid metrics in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following catheter ablation (CA) remains controversial. This study investigated the effectiveness of novel lipid parameter non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)/HDL-C ratio (NHHR) in predicting post-ablation AF recurrence. MethodsIn this cohort study, 1,728 patients with AF undergoing first-time CA at our center (2017- 2020) were stratified by NHHR quartiles (Q1-Q4). The primary outcome was AF recurrence following CA. Logistic regression analysis was used to detect the association between NHHR and major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). ResultsA U-shaped relationship was observed between the NHHR and AF recurrence (Pnonlinear=0.021), with an inflection point at NHHR=2.61. Compared to the optimal range (2.62-3.26), patients with Q1 of NHHR had a 63.6% higher recurrence risk (hazard ratio [HR]=1.636, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.235-2.166). In cases with the NHHR < 2.61, the AF recurrence risk decreased with an adjusted HR of 0.715 (95% CI, 0.524-0.977, P = 0.035) for every one unit increment in the NHHR. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed consistency. NHHR demonstrated no association with MACCEs, underscoring its AF-specific prognostic value. ConclusionsThis study demonstrated a novel U-shaped association between NHHR and AF recurrence following CA. NHHR serves as a robust biomarker for AF recurrence risk stratification post-ablation, reflecting bidirectional lipid pathophysiology beyond atherosclerotic pathways. These findings advocate for NHHR integration into clinical monitoring protocols while cautioning against therapeutic NHHR manipulation without mechanistic validation. Trial registrationChiCTR-OCH-14004674

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.