Limitations of Public Biomechanical Movement Datasets for Deep Learning: Issues of Metadata, Standardization, and Variety in Motion Types
Friemert, D.; Schnur, D.; Runkel, S.; Borsch, J.; Karamanidis, K.; Dellen, B.; Thieme, L.; Fiedler, A.; Jaeckel, U.; Hartmann, U.
Show abstract
Biomechanical data play a crucial role in health research by providing relevant information about musculoskeletal mechanical loading and neuromuscular dysfunction during movement, which are essential for optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. The relevance of such data for decision making processes in clinical settings depends on its quality and volume, as larger datasets enable more robust conclusions across diverse populations and conditions. In machine learning, extensive and representative datasets are vital for training algorithms to develop accurate predictive models. This systematic literature review explores the current landscape of biomechanical datasets and databases, examining existing resources, identifying gaps in data availability and quality, and discussing the potential for a new, structured database to address these shortcomings. We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer, and arXiv using keywords related to biomechanics, gait, and human activity recognition (HAR). The review identified studies covering various motion types, data formats, and metadata availability. Our findings highlight significant challenges, including inconsistent metadata, lack of standardization during data acquisition and data processing, limited motion variety, and accessibility issues. Addressing these challenges through standardized data formats, comprehensive metadata, and enhanced accessibility could greatly advance decision making processes via machine learning approaches for clinical and therapeutic settings. This review emphasizes the need for improved biomechanical data resources to support the development of accurate machine learning models and innovative clinical interventions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Virtual Reality Dataset to Support Hand Action Observation in Rehabilitation and Motor Learning Studies 95%
- 3D-ARM-Gaze: a public dataset of 3D Arm Reaching Movements with Gaze information in virtual reality 94%
- A hand biomechanics dataset of kinematics, kinetics, electromyography, and imaging in healthy adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population Analysis Of Mortality Risk: Predictive Models Using Motion Sensors For 100,000 Participants In The UK Biobank National Cohort 93%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 92%
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching 94%
- Statistical and machine learning models for classification of human wear and delivery days in accelerometry data 94%
- Using a Motion Sensor to Categorize Low Back Pain Patients: A Machine Learning Approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Playing the piano with a robotic third thumb: Assessing constraints of human augmentation 94%
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 94%
- Free Energy Principle in Human Postural Control System: Skin Stretch Feedback Reduces the Entropy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of two-dimensional video-based inference of finger kinematics with pose estimation 95%
- Analyzing Human Movements - Introducing A Framework To Extract And Evaluate Biomechanical Data 94%
- Development and validation of FootNet; a new kinematic algorithm to improve foot-strike and toe-off detection in treadmill running 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.