Back

Integrating Drug-like Moieties and Binding Site Evolution for Kinase Inhibitor Prediction Using Ensemble Learning Models

Lin, W.-L.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Yang, J.-M.

2025-06-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.28.656738 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein kinases play a pivotal role in regulating cellular signaling pathways, and their dysregulation is closely associated with numerous diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disorders, and inflammation. Although over 100,000 kinase inhibitors have been developed, only a small fraction has achieved FDA approval, primarily due to off-target effects stemming from the high conservation of kinase binding sites. To address this challenge, we present an ensemble learning framework that integrates both chemical and protein-level information to improve the prediction of selective kinase inhibitors. On the compound side, we construct a 1,048-dimensional feature representation encompassing topological fingerprints, drug-like moieties, atomic composition, and stereochemical descriptors. On the protein side, we develop a 1,700- dimensional representation of kinase binding site environments using multiple sequence alignment and evolutionary conservation information. Comprehensive evaluations across 131 human kinases show that the integration of these features significantly improves model performance, achieving 93.6% accuracy on an independent test set. Furthermore, SHAP-based model interpretation reveals that high-impact features correspond to known binding motifs, such as the P-loop, Hinge region, and DFG motif, as confirmed by crystal structure validation. Lastly, we apply the model to a curated dataset of flavonoid-like compounds, identifying potential natural product-derived kinase inhibitors. This study demonstrates that the proposed integrative approach not only enhances predictive accuracy but also provides interpretable insights into kinase-ligand interactions, offering a promising direction for rational kinase inhibitor design.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.