Back

Molecular dynamics driving phenotypic divergence among KRAS mutants in pancreatic tumorigenesis

Grimont, A.; Falvo, D. J.; Sisso, W. J.; Zumbo, P.; Chan, C. W.; Santos, F.; Pan, G.; Cleveland, M.; Yaron, T.; Osterhoudt, A. S.; Meng, Y.; Zafra, M. P.; Fall, W. B.; Rendeiro, A. F.; Hissong, E.; Yantiss, R. K.; Betel, D.; Magnuson, M. A.; Leach, S. D.; Rustgi, A. K.; Dow, L. E.; Chandwani, R.

2025-06-01 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.05.28.656689 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inflammation in the pancreas drives acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM), a progenitor-like state that can be hijacked by mutant Kras in the formation of pancreatic cancer (PDAC). How these cell fate decisions vary according to KRAS mutation remains poorly understood. To define mutation-specific lineage reversion and tumor initiation, we implement novel Ptf1a-TdTomato mice and multiple KRAS mutants across an array of genetic, pharmacologic, and inflammatory perturbations in vivo. Whereas KRASG12D co-opts injury to enable lineage reversion, enhancer reprogramming, and tumor initiation, KRASG12R/V can initiate but not sustain dedifferentiated and neoplastic transcriptional and epigenetic programs. We find the KRASG12R/V defects consist of a failure to invoke robust EGFR signaling and activate Rac1/Vav1, with constitutive Akt activation in vivo sufficient to rescue the tumorigenic potential of KRASG12R. As the marked heterogeneity among KRAS variants begins early in tumorigenesis, these data are crucial to understanding mutation-specific oncogenic trajectories and directing the implementation of KRAS-directed therapeutics. SIGNIFICANCEDefining how KRAS mutants drive distinct outcomes in human pancreatic cancer is critical for developing allele-specific therapeutic approaches. This study unveils a hierarchy among KRASG12D, KRASG12V, and KRASG12R to drive tumor initiation, owing to heterogeneous activation of EGFR, PI3K/AKT, and RAC1 signaling, thus revealing mutation-specific evolutionary paths in pancreatic tumorigenesis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.8%
3
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.0%
4
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
5
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
6
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.2%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
10
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.0%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.7%
12
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
13
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
18
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
22
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
24
Genes & Development
90 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%