Back

Not all alloantibodies are created equal: IgG glycosylation and severity of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation

Noble, J.; Glendenning, L. M.; Dard, C.; Bourdin, A.; Carlson, G. C.; Cobb, B. A.; Cravedi, P.

2025-05-30 immunology
10.1101/2025.05.28.656600 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAntibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a leading cause of kidney transplant (KT) failure, driven by donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). However, not all patients with DSA experience accelerated graft loss, suggesting that factors beyond antibody presence influence AMR severity. Post-translational modifications, particularly glycosylation of Immunoglobulin-G (IgG), play a critical role in modulating antibody function. This study investigates the association between IgG glycosylation profiles and the risk and severity of AMR in KT recipients. MethodsWe prospectively analyzed 65 KT patients, including 26 with acute AMR (aAMR), 27 with chronic-active AMR (caAMR), and 12 controls without rejection. IgG glycosylation was quantified using lectin-based ELISA, focusing on mannose, fucose, sialic acid, and bisecting N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) levels. ResultsResults showed that bisecting GlcNAc levels of total IgG were significantly higher in caAMR patients than controls (p=0.019) and aAMR patients (p=0.045). Multivariable analysis revealed that higher bisecting GlcNAc levels of IgG were independently associated with glomerulitis [g-score, OR: 2.7 (95%CI: 1.2-6.7), p=0.019] and chronic glomerulopathy [cg-score, OR: 2.8 (95%CI: 1.3-7.5), p=0.021], independent of DSA presence. ConclusionsThese findings indicate an association between IgG glycosylation, particularly bisecting GlcNAc, and AMR severity. IgG glycosylation profiles could serve as biomarkers for AMR risk and severity, offering new insights into the mechanisms of AMR and potential therapeutic targets.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.